If a random sample of 10 people found that 9 were pro-life (i.e., 90%), while another random sample of 1000 people from the same population found that 550 were pro-life (i.e., 55%), which would you find more significant? Why?
Offer any personal experiences where you might have trusted results from a small sample more than that of a large sample, and explain why that was the case.© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com June 4, 2020, 12:11 am ad1c9bdddf
This 630 word solution compares hypothesis tests for large and small samples and in ...
This 630 word solution compares hypothesis tests for large and small samples and in particular compares p-values of the tests to evaluate which test is more signficant. Part two of the question is addressed with an example comparting a large volunteer sample with a smaller randomly selected sample.