Critical Thinking Concept Review
1. Choose three peer C-reviewed research articles and write a short review of each of them that includes the following:
a. Write the problem statement.
b. Name the theoretical model used or briefly describe the overall conceptual model.
c. Write out the main research questions. What is the rationale for the question?
d. List the main hypotheses that the study seems to be testing.
e. Define the dependent variable and the main independent variables.
f. Briefly describe the research design.
g. Describe the sample (e.g. size, sociodemographic characteristics) and how it was obtained.
h. List the statistics used to test the hypotheses.
i. Identify the main assumptions and limitations.
The research article is:
Medication adherence among HIV+ adults:
Effects of cognitive dysfunction and regimen complexity
C.H. Hinkin, PhD, S.A. Castellon, PhD, R.S. Durvasula, PhD, D.J. Hardy, PhD, M.N. Lam,
PhD, K.I. Mason, PhD, D. Thrasher, PhD, M.B. Goetz, MD, and M. Stefaniak, BA
Department of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences (Drs. Hinkin, Castellon, Hardy, Lam, Mason,
and Thrasher, and M. Stefaniak), UCLA School of Medicine; VA Greater Los Angeles Health
Care System (Drs. Hinkin, Castellon, Lam, and Goetz); Department of Psychology (Dr.
Durvasula), California State University at Los Angeles; and Department of Medicine (Dr. Goetz),
UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
The objective of this research article or study to see the effects of cognitive impairment impaired vs normal) and medication regimen complexity (medication taken one or two doses/day vs three times daily) on antiretroviral adherence.
This solution is comprised of a detailed explanation on null and alternative hypothesis, methods used in analysis, final conclusion based on the test statistics and p-values of a research article.
Critical Analysis of a Scholarly Article: Closing the Accounting Talent Gap
Critical Analysis of a Scholarly Article
Scholarly writers are aware of their audience and base their writing on solid evidence rather than on assumptions and/or opinions. In addition, scholarly writers must also utilize a scholarly voice. This assignment will give you practice in scholarly writing and using a scholarly voice.
To prepare for this assignment:
- Review the handout: Study Notes: Introduction to Scholarly Writing: Finding a Scholarly Voice.
Locate and save the following article in the Walden Library:
- Thomson, J. (2009). Closing the accounting talent gap. The CPA Journal, 79(12), 13-14. Retrieved from ABI/INFORM Global database
With this article as your basis, complete the following using your other resources for the week as a guide:
- Write a summary of this article in which you:
o Describe the central research problem or topic
o Explain the purpose of the article
o Describe what the author(s) concluded
o Analyze the logic of what you have read
- Include an analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the article as a piece of scholarly writing and of its appropriateness for its intended audience.
- Briefly review at least two different references listed in the article. How do they support this article and its conclusions?
- Use at least three of the standards for critical thinking as described in Chapter 7, "Critical Thinking," in the course text.
Be sure that your summary and analysis demonstrate your understanding of scholarly writing and your skill in using a scholarly voice, and is appropriate for your intended audience.View Full Posting Details