Explore BrainMass
Share

Explore BrainMass

    Statistical Analysis of Poll Results

    This content was COPIED from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

    POLL: OBAMA, MCCAIN LEAD IN N.H. HUCKABEE NOT SEEING GAINS FROM IOWA WIN

    ALL EYES ON NEW HAMPSHIRE; TOP CONTENDERSâ?? HOPES PIVOT ON FIRST PRIMARY

    ELECTION 2008: How the voters upended pollsters

    Pollsters the most shocked at New Hampshire outcome

    Read all of the articles, noting when the articles were written, which candidate they say is ahead, and the margin of error. Then answer the following questions.

    What went wrong with the polls?
    How could it be that all the highly educated and highly paid statisticians were wrong about who would win the Democratic primary?

    Explain in your own words what is meant by the statistical dead heat and the 5% margin of error mentioned in the first article.

    © BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 10, 2019, 3:35 am ad1c9bdddf
    https://brainmass.com/statistics/confidence-interval/statistical-analysis-poll-results-426305

    Attachments

    Solution Preview

    In the poll mentioned in the first article, Obama led Clinton 33% to 31%, but the poll had a 5% margin of error, which means a 95% confidence interval for Obama's support was [28%, 38%] while that of Clinton was [26%, 36%]. Since these confidence intervals ...

    Solution Summary

    We apply tools of statistics to analyze results from polls of the 2008 New Hampshire Democratic primary, and why pollsters picked the wrong candidate.

    $2.19