What are the advantages and disadvantages of personal psychotherapy as a requirement of graduate training programs. Please cite any relevant ethical codes by the APA.© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 25, 2018, 9:01 am ad1c9bdddf
Welcome warmly to BM! I offer 200 words of my notes and references. Please rate 5/5 accordingly.
As you briefly identify some of the benefits, I feel that it allows a greater sense of awareness with psychotherapy; it allows one to fully immerse in the experience of a therapeutic process to foster a personal as well as professional understanding. It also provides a method for closer self-assessment and self-observation. If graduate student can comprehend the process on a personal level, then their levels of transfer to a professional domain can be heightened.
Researchers such as Irvin Yalom cite that it is beneficial and ethical since "therapist's most valuable instrument ... the therapist's own self." It also is helpful for instilling greater empathy for patients, fostering more "patience and tolerance of ...
The advantages and disadvantages of personal psychotherapy as a requirement of graduate training programs are briefly summarized. 200 words of my notes and references are utilized.
Statistics Questions - quasi-experiments
A. Complete Jackson Even-numbered chapter exercises, p, 360
1Describe the advantages and disadvantages of quasi-experiments? What is the fundamental weakness of a quasi-experimental design? Why is it a weakness? Does its weakness always matter?
2If you randomly assign participants to groups, can you assume the groups are equivalent at the beginning of the study? At the end? Why or why not? If you cannot assume equivalence at either end, what can you do? Please explain.
3Explain and give examples of how the particular outcomes of a study can suggest if a particular threat is likely to have been present.
4Describe each of the following types of designs, explain its logic, and why the design does or does not address the selection threats discussed in Chapter 7 of Trochim and Donnelly (2006):
Non-equivalent control group pretest only
Non-equivalent control group pretest/posttest
5Why are quasi-experimental designs used more often than experimental designs?
6One conclusion you might reach (hint) after completing the readings for this assignment is that there are no bad designs, only bad design choices (and implementations). State a research question for which a single-group post-test only design can yield relatively unambiguous findings.
Part II - Answer the following questions:
1What research question(s) does the study address?
2What is Goldberg's rationale for the study? Was the study designed to contribute to theory? Do the results of the study contribute to theory? For both questions: If so, how? If not, why not?
3What constructs does the study address? How are they operationalized?
4What are the independent and dependent variables in the study?
5Name the type of design the researchers used.
6What internal and external validity threats did the researchers address in their design? How did they address them? Are there threats they did not address? If so how does the failure to address the threats affect the researchers' interpretations of their findings? Are Goldberg's conclusions convincing? Why or why not?
Support your paper with a minimum of 5 resources