Explore BrainMass

Explore BrainMass

    Semantic Generalization

    This content was COPIED from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

    How is semantic generalization different from other examples of generalization?

    © BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com March 4, 2021, 6:07 pm ad1c9bdddf

    Solution Preview

    Please refer to response file attached. I hope this helps and take care.

    STIMULUS GENERALIZATION in Classical Conditioning: The closer a stimulus is on some PHYSICAL dimension to a Conditioned Stimulus, the greater will be the Conditioned Response. For example, the closer a melody is to the melody of "your song," the more that melody will make you feel the way "your song" makes you feel. For Pavlov, the closer the sound of the bell was to the original bell, the more likely the dog would salivate. What about stimuli that resemble conditioned stimuli SEMANTICALLY, rather than PHYSICALLY? Will a synonym cause you to feel feelings that the original causes? There is classic research on this question. A little thought reveals intriguing implications for advertising.
    Semantic generalization
    Conditioning of a reaction to a nonverbal stimulus; and subsequent generalization of the response to verbal signs representative of the original stimulus. The types include generalization from object to sign, from sign to sign, and from sign to object. Said another ways, it is centered on the concept of meaning rather than physical difference. Internal responses - thoughts, emotional reactions produce links between physically dissimilar words. ...

    Solution Summary

    This solution responds to the question: How is semantic generalization different from other examples of generalization? Research validated, with references provided.