Explore BrainMass
Share

The pros and cons of spending limits on political campaigns

This content was STOLEN from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

What if. . . Spending Limits Were Placed on Campaigns?

© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 25, 2018, 2:56 am ad1c9bdddf
https://brainmass.com/political-science/american-politics/the-pros-and-cons-of-spending-limits-on-political-campaigns-320766

Solution Preview

This is a good question because the Supreme Court has over the years consistently allowed for contribution limits on individuals and corporations, but has disallowed spending limits on political campaigns. Many people believe the influence of money on politics is the root cause of corruption (or one of them). Therefore, if you limited campaign spending politicians would be less beholden to fundraisers (often lobbyists) or other sources of money. As a practical matter, politicians would also spend less time raising money and presumably more time working directly for their constituents on issues.

So the main benefits for ...

Solution Summary

Many people believe the influence of money on politics is the root cause of corruption (or one of them). Others believe that spending money on political campaigns is vital to freedom of speech. This solution looks at some of the arguments for and against spending limits and the possible pros and cons of each.

$2.19
See Also This Related BrainMass Solution

Collecting Financial Contributions to Political Parties

Discuss the ways that political parties and candidates are able to gain contributions. Considering this, what are some of the debates over how it is obtained and if there should be stronger limitations. Make a case for one side or show the pros and cons of each.

View Full Posting Details