Purchase Solution

The concept of causality in Hume, Leibniz and Kant

Not what you're looking for?

Ask Custom Question

Assume Leibniz, Kant and Hume were given the following claim: "Every event is determined by a cause according to constant laws". How would each of the three philosophers defend and explain this claim? Make sure to identify how each of their three philosophical systems differ, especially as regards to causation.

Purchase this Solution
Solution Summary

How would Hume, Leibniz and Kant react to the saying "Every event is determined by a cause according to constant laws"? This is the subject that this post addresses.

Solution Preview

Starting with Leibniz, one could say that for him, any event could be explained by a prior cause and that prior cause must also be explained by an earlier cause. But referring to prior cause cannot really explain the reason for the existence of any event. There has to be a cause that is outside the series of causes. The final or sufficient reason for all things is to be found in the substance whose own existence is necessary and requires no prior cause and no explanation, that is, a "necessary Being whose essence involves existence". This being is God. He is the cause or sufficient reason or the ordinary events we experience in the world. Leibniz rejected the theory of atoms, that is, of matter as primary and substituted it with Monads which, unlike atoms, are not extended bodies. A monad is a metaphysically existent point and behaves according to its own pre-established purpose. When each monad behaves ...

Purchase this Solution
Free BrainMass Quizzes
Descartes Meditations on First Philosophy

Short quiz relating to Descartes

The World Health Organization

This quiz assesses the students knowledge about the World Health Organization. Although listed under “Philosophy” it is relevant to health care, political science, pre-med, and social scientist students as well.

View More Free Quizzes
Related BrainMass Solutions

  • Metaphysical Issues

    British empiricism was, on the other hand, a reaction to rationalist and speculative metaphysics. David Hume was one of the first philosophers to doubt religion, but look at his critique of causality.

  • Plato, Descartes, Hume and Kant on Human Nature

    557895 Plato, Descartes, Hume and Kant on Human Nature Please describe the terms and ideas of human nature from the perspective of Plato, Descartes, Kant, and Hume.

  • Kierkegaard's ideologies

    In this view therefore of the three approaches Kantian approach to knowledge is the best attempt to rescue knowledge from the skeptical clutches of Hume where using causation, Kant demonstrates contrary to Hume, that "causation is a necessary prior element

  • Do the senses play a primary role in knowledge?

    This post discusses the roles of sense perception and reason in the acquisition of knowledge. For instance, on what depends knowledge that is true in the past, present and future? Philosophers briefly discussed are Hume and Kant.

  • Examining problems of the concepts of cause and effect

    These perceptions take the form of impressions and ideas where ideas are copies of impressions. In his Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding (1748) Hume laid out another way of understanding causality.

  • The limits of empiricism and rationalism

    This was later developed by Descartes, Leibniz and Spinoza. But the rationalists' claim to achieve knowledge and truth only by the means of the intellect is unproved.

  • Do I Have an Obligation to Help Others?

    Answer that question from the point of view of Hume and Kant. Hume Hume claimed that desire and not reason is what governs human behavior.

  • Determinism, empiricism and rationalism

    Other philosophers would be Immanuel Kant, who stated in his Critique of Pure Reason, that the mind imposes certain categories of thought like space, time, and causality on the sense experience in order to make sense of them and operate in the world.

  • Is there a God?

    ANSELM (AND LATER PLANTINGA) IN SUPPORT OF ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT; DESCARTES USE OF *A FORM* OF THE ONTOLOGICAL IN HIS MEDITATIONS (PERHAPS DISTINGUISH HIS ARGUMENT FROM THE CLASSICAL ONTOLOGY OF ANSELM); KANT IN SUPPORT OF THE MORAL ARGUMENT (GOD AS REQUISITE

View More Related Solutions