Premise and conclusion

Related BrainMass Solutions

• Proofs using Modus Pollens, Modus Tollens

  ~D > ~F [Premise] 2. ~~F [Premise] 3. ~~D [Modus tollens on 1 and 2] 4. ~D v (L > ~F) [Premise] 5. (L > ~F) [Disjunctive syllogism of 3 and 4] 6. ~L [Modus tollens on 2 and 5; Conclusion] D). 1.

• Construct proofs for given valid arguments using the eight rules of inference.

  [Conjunction on 2 and 3] 5. (E v T) ... [Modus Ponens on 1 and 4] 6. T ... [Disjunctive Syllogism on 3 and 5; Conclusion] [B] 1. (R v P) > (G v M) ... [Premise] 2. R & U ...

• Deductive and Inductive Reasoning Arguments

  407505 Contrast deductive and inductive arguments. Please explain the difference in deductive arguments that are valid, but not sound and deductive arguments that are valid and sound. Please provide example of both in premise conclusion form.

• Trying to understand and show how to solve problems using the rules of validity to show when syllogisms are valid.

  If the premise is true and the conclusion is false it is invalid. The first term is the major premise. The second term is the minor premise. The third term is the conclusion.

• Quantificational formal logic

  The x means for all x Solution: Premise: (P1) Premise: (P2) Conclusion: We know that: Hence Similarly we have: But And by Demorgan's Law.

• Developping arguments

  The conclusion is clear. 1. All major polluters are industrialized countries (major premise, assumed) But no industrialized country is ready to limit their pollution (minor premise, stated) Therefore pollution will not be limited.

• True and false logic statements about premises and conclusions

  Valid arguments can have a false premise and a true conclusion.
  
  This is correct and I will give you a popular example (not my own).

• Syllogisms: Major, Minor and Middle Term

  Mood-wise, I believe it follows the EIO pattern, with the major premise being a universal negative, the minor premise being a particular affirmative and the conclusion being a particular negative.

• examples of systemqatic and logical reasoning

  Conclusion: Mainstream and minority groups feel that affirmative action programs are unfair. 5. Premise: the death penalty has no deterrent effect (a bad) and can result in the death of innocent people (another bad).