Explore BrainMass

Partial Differential Equations : Wiener Process and Ito's Lemma

This content was STOLEN from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

Please help with the following problems. See the following posting for the complete equations

Consider a random variable r satisfying the stochastic differential equation:

Where are positive constants and dX is a Wiener process. Let

(see attached file)

which transforms the domain for r into (-1,1) for Xi Suppose the stochastic equation for the new random variable Xi is in the form:

dXi= a(Xi)dt + b(Xi)dX.

Find the concrete expressions for a(Xi) and b(Xi) and show that a(Xi) and b(Xi) fulfill the conditions:

{a(-1) = 0, and {a(1) = 0,
{b(-1) = 0, and {b(1) = 0.

I am confused because I don't know if you can use Ito's lemma to find the concrete expressions for a(Xi) and b(Xi). Also when taking the partial derivative of ξ with respect to r, I do not know how to treat the absolute value sign. Thanks.

© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 24, 2018, 9:55 pm ad1c9bdddf


Solution Summary

Wiener Processes and Ito's Lemma are investigated in the following posting. The solution is detailed and well presented. The response received a rating of "5/5" from the student who originally posted the question.

See Also This Related BrainMass Solution

Financial Partial Differential Equations : Black-Scholes and Ito's Lemma

Please see the attached file for the fully formatted problems.

If and we let , then , where and . Define . Suppose that the stock pays dividends continuously:

? D(S,t) => dividend
? If dividend is paid continuosly:
* D(S,t)dt = D0Sdt
* D0 is a constant dividend rate

Derive the equation for directly by using Itô's lemma.
(Hint: Take as the portfolio during the derivation)

Notes: Derivation of B-S Equation:

V denotes the value of an option that depends on the value of the underlying asset S and time t, ie, V = V(S,t). In a time step dt, the underlying asset pays out a dividend SD0dt, where D0 is a constant known as the dividend yield. S satisfies According to Itô's lemma, the random walk followed by V is given by:

. *

V has at least one t derivative and two S derivatives. Construct a portfolio consisting of one option and a number -Δ of the underlying asset. This number is not yet known. The value of this portfolio is:
. **

Because the portfolio contains one option and a number -Δ of the underlying asset, and the owner of the portfolio receives SD0dt for every asset held, the earnings for the owner of the portfolio during the time step dt is:


Using *, it is apparent that Π follows the random walk:

The random component in this random walk can be eliminated by choosing:

. ***

This results in a portfolio whose increment is wholly deterministic:


Because the return for any risk-free portfolio should be r,

. ****

Substituting ** and *** into **** and dividing by dt:


This is the Black-Scholes partial differential equation. The key idea of deriving this equation is to eliminate the uncertainty or the risk. dΠ is not a differential in the usual sense. It is the earning of the holder of the portfolio during the time step dt. Therefore, appears. In the derivation, in order to eliminate any small risk, Δ is chosen before an uncertainty appears and does not depend on the coming risk. Therefore, no differential of Δ is needed.

View Full Posting Details