Purchase Solution

Daubert Rule in contrast to the Frye Standard

Not what you're looking for?

Ask Custom Question

I need help explaining the Daubert Rule in contrast to the Frye Standard and disclose which one of the two would allow for the identification of more expert witnesses if they were used exclusively. I also need help explaining how ethics plays a large part in testimony by an expert witness. Disclose how the Daubert Rule and the Frye Standard could both be allowed by the court in determining who is an expert witness for the case.

Be sure to reference all sources using APA style.

Purchase this Solution
Solution Summary

Daubert Rule in contrast to the Frye Standard

Solution Preview

http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/daubert_standard

I need help explaining the Daubert Rule in contrast to the Frye Standard and disclose which one of the two would allow for the identification of more expert witnesses if they were used exclusively. I also need to help explaining how ethics plays a large part in testimony by an expert witness. Disclose how the Daubert Rule and the Frye Standard could both be allowed by the court in determining who is an expert witness for the case.

In contrast to the Frye standard, that dictates a court must ascertain whether ...

Solution provided by:
Raushaun Rigsby, MSc
Education
  • Associates of Arts , Lone Star Community College
  • Bachelor of Science , Sam Houston State University
  • Masters of Science, Kaplan University
  • Masters of Science , Kaplan University
Recent Feedback
  • "Thank you however I have two questions: 1.) where in this passage is the actual problem statement? 2.) if you used references can you please provide them? This is great work and I am so grateful. "
  • "Thank you very much"
  • "excellent analysis"
  • "graet job very helpful"
  • "Thank you, excellent and very detailed."
Purchase this Solution
Free BrainMass Quizzes
Evidence

Do you know your evidence objections? Find out with this quiz!

Title VII

This Quiz pertains to the spectrum of Human Rights through Title VII

Criminal Defenses Review

Test your knowledge of the basics of criminal law and defenses with this quiz.

Constitutional Law Rights

How much do you know about Constitutional Law Rights? Find out with this quiz!

Title VII Laws

Learn the basics of the laws under Title VII.

View More Free Quizzes
Related BrainMass Solutions

  • Daubert vs. Frye Standards

    Compare and contrast the analysis of the standard used to a state using a different standard. Which standard do you prefer? Explain why. DAUBERT VS.

  • Polygraph Testing: Frye or Daubert

    However, perhaps, in cases where it is not relevant, Frye ruling should be used. Conversely, in Daubert v.

  • The Polygraph Test

    (CoA, 1993) Known as the Daubert Standard it 'took over' the Frye test (1923 case involving admissibility of polygraph evidence) that coupled with the evidence' said relevance to the case became the basis of how it influences judgement in a trial/court

  • DNA Testing

    testimony should be admissible in court, which test (Frye or Daubert) is more appropriate, and the potential effect this testimony could have on a given case. In Frye v.

  • Biometrics in Criminal justice

    What is the role of the Frye standard or Daubert standard in determining whether or not the courts will accept biometric evidence?

  • On the Daubert Standard

    It has been established in the 1993 case of Daubert vs. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., replacing the Frye standard federally.

  • Scientific Evidence

    This standard for evidence requires the proponent of the expert testimony to lay a more extensive foundation than was previously required under the Frye rule.

  • Ethics in forensic investigation and the Daubert test

    609134 Ethics in Forensic Investigation and the Daubert Test 1. What would it take to qualify a forensic accountant who plans to give expert testimony in an embezzlement case under the Daubert test? 2.

  • Expert Witness

    Is there a standard by which an expert witness must testify? A3. Two U.S. Supreme Court cases and a change in Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence changed the way in which expert witnesses can testify in federal court.

View More Related Solutions