Strict Liability for Abnormally Dangerous Activities

Related BrainMass Solutions

• Standard of Liability in Electrocutions

  However, the concept of absolute liability is reserved only for abnormally dangerous activities for which no degree of care can truly provide safety.

• Exercise company manufactures bike which is purchased and pl

  Generally, the court only uses strict liability to apply to activities that are inherently dangerous - like carrying explosive materials.

• Strict Liability and Negligence for Product Liability

  Strict liability is a newer concept, and grounded in absolute liability, or the idea "that business should be liable for the inevitable injuries that result from its activities" (Kiely, Ottley, 2005).

• Public Policy and Strict Product Liability

  189201 Public Policy Reason A public policy reason for imposing strict product liability on all in the chain of distribution is: a. These parties are able to insure against product liability costs. b.

• Strict Liability

  Strict liability scenario is posed.

• Negligence and Liability

  In liability, specifically strict liability, the person who is hurt only needs to show that the harm was caused and that the defendant was responsible for whatever product or procedure caused the harm.

• Business law: Criminal vs civil tort, white collar crime

  Thus, once strict liability is proven for a specific product or essential activity, the victim doesn't have to prove anything else but that he was harmed.

• Plaintiff: Product Recall

  Discuss for which tort you would sue: negligence, strict liability, etc. If you state the law in your answer, be sure to cite your source of information. Discuss whether you would sue the manufacturer based on negligence or strict liability.

• Intoxicated Contracts and Liability

  This is true for injury - for example, if person has dangerous animal he or she is strictly liable for any harm inflicted by animal.