Purchase Solution

Varity Corp. v. Howe: Religious Discrimination

Not what you're looking for?

Ask Custom Question

In Varity Corp. v. Howe the court held that:Answer

A. ERISA fiduciaries do not have any fiduciary duty to disclose truthful information on their own initiative.

B. ERISA's fiduciary standards were intended to protect the integrity of the plan, not the individual beneficiaries.

C. ERISA fiduciaries are required to discharge their duties with regard to the plan solely in the interest of the participants and beneficiaries.

D. ERISA's remedies for breach of fiduciary duty were limited to the plan itself and participants and beneficiaries have no claim.

Purchase this Solution
Solution Summary

This solution provides the correct answer with an explanation and reference to the Varity Corp. v. Howe Corp. question presented.

Solution Preview

D. ERISA's remedies for breach of fiduciary duty were limited to the plan itself and participants and beneficiaries have no ...

Purchase this Solution
Free BrainMass Quizzes
Title VII

This Quiz pertains to the spectrum of Human Rights through Title VII

Constitutional Law Rights

How much do you know about Constitutional Law Rights? Find out with this quiz!

Contract Requirments

How much do you know about the legal requirements for a contract? Find out with this quiz!

Title VII Laws

Learn the basics of the laws under Title VII.

Evidence

Do you know your evidence objections? Find out with this quiz!

View More Free Quizzes
Related BrainMass Solutions

  • Major Energy: Pension Plan Modifications

    Supreme Court in Varity Corp. v. Howe. This is a violation of 404(a) because it went against the best interest of the beneficiaries, which is also the ruling that was found in Varity Corp. v. Howe (same case as the other question).

  • FedEx and Dreadlocks: Religious Freedom or Policy Violation?

    EEOC v. Federal Express Corp. Retrieved from EEOC v. Federal Express Corp. - FindLaw HR.blr.com. (2006, 22 Feb). FedEx Settles Dreadlocks Case.

  • Lawrence v. Texas

    You are a first year associate with the firm of Doowe, Cheatham & Howe. Mr. Howe, the senior partner in the firm, has asked you to prepare a legal brief on the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Lawrence v. Texas.

  • Employees' Religious Rights

    Religious Discrimination. Retrieved on 8/28/2011 from http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/types/religion.cfm SUTTON v.

  • Religious discrimination in the context of Meredith

    Since, customers have told Bill about the problem, asking her to limit her religious beliefs will not cause religious discrimination. (Wilson v. U.S. West Communications, 58 F.3d 1337).

  • Disparate Treatment

    Appropriate case citation Mcdonnell Douglas Corp. V. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973) 411 U.S. 792 Mcdonnell Douglas Corp. V. Green Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Eighth Circuit No. 72-490. 1.

  • Corporation of the Presiding Bishops of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints v. Amos

    He claimed that he was subject to religious discrimination, but the Church argued that its religious affiliations exempted it from being subject to religious discrimination charges.

  • HR Management & Law

    The practice of using an intake questionnaire that reflects on the age of an applicant relates to Age Discrimination in Employment Act compliance. (See: Federal Express Corp. v. Paul Holowecki).

  • Violations of Clayton Act and Robinson-Patman Act

    Price discrimination II. Exclusive dealing III. Tying contracts IV. Stock acquisition of competing companies V. Interlocking directorates A. II only B. I, II, III, and V only C.

View More Related Solutions