Purchase Solution

Violations in National Regulatory Bodies

Not what you're looking for?

Ask Custom Question

Research the case of Martha Stewart, who was sent to prison for violating a regulation of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)—a national regulatory body related to trading stocks.
Based on the case of Stewart, express your views on the following:
• What were the circumstances of this case? Who are the victims and which community was involved?
• Do you agree with what the courts did with the Stewart case? Why or why not?
• Do you feel that Stewart made amends to those victims affected in the case? Why or why not? Provide evidence in support of your opinion.
• How would restorative justice play out for Stewart? Which type of encounter would be most effective here? Why?
• How would the victims or the community benefit from a restorative process in this case?
• Consider the nature of the offense. Do you think white collar crimes, such as this one, are amenable to a restorative approach? Why or why not?

Purchase this Solution

Solution Summary

The violations in national regulatory bodies are found. The circumstances of this case and the victims are determined.

Solution Preview

http://coveringbusiness.com/2012/05/15/what-martha-stewart-did-wrong/

Based on the case of Stewart, express your views on the following:

• What were the circumstances of this case? Who are the victims and which community was involved?

The circumstances of the case were actually complicated wherein Stewart was charged with an offense that was not easy to prove. Although she was initially charged with insider trading and securities fraud, prosecutors had to rescind these charges because of the facts associated with the case. She sold stocks based upon information that was nonpublic material according to investigators, but Stewart and her defense argued that she had instructed her broker to sell the stocks whenever the price dropped below $60 per share. Therefore, the prosecution needed to prove that she knew about the impending implosion of the stock price because of insider information to gain a conviction for insider traiding.

In essecne, Stewart had no actual duty to refrain from tradinig on information about ...

Solution provided by:
Education
  • Associates of Arts , Lone Star Community College
  • Bachelor of Science , Sam Houston State University
  • Masters of Science, Kaplan University
  • Masters of Science , Kaplan University
Recent Feedback
  • "Thank you however I have two questions: 1.) where in this passage is the actual problem statement? 2.) if you used references can you please provide them? This is great work and I am so grateful. "
  • "Thank you very much"
  • "excellent analysis"
  • "graet job very helpful"
  • "Thank you, excellent and very detailed."
Purchase this Solution


Free BrainMass Quizzes
Criminal Defenses Review

Test your knowledge of the basics of criminal law and defenses with this quiz.

Contract Requirments

How much do you know about the legal requirements for a contract? Find out with this quiz!

Evidence

Do you know your evidence objections? Find out with this quiz!

Constitutional Law Rights

How much do you know about Constitutional Law Rights? Find out with this quiz!

Title VII Laws

Learn the basics of the laws under Title VII.