Explore BrainMass
Share

Explore BrainMass

    Miller v. Alabama and Jackson v. Arkansas

    This content was COPIED from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

    Refer to http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/10-9646g2i8.pdf to read the cases of Miller v. Alabama and Jackson v. Arkansas (2012). Discuss these two cases as a differential way of dealing with juveniles being tried and sentenced as adults but not subject to all the rules of adult sentencing laws. justify your ideas and responses by citing appropriate examples from references within the texts, Web sites, and other resources or apply examples from personal experience

    Obviously, both of these cases fell under the Capital Murder statutes of both states. Differentiate the peacemaking philosophy and deontological philosophy in the context of capital murder sentencing for juveniles?

    What would be the difference between the utilitarian and the deontological philosophies of the two cases reviewed?

    Use references/cite sources

    © BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 10, 2019, 7:35 am ad1c9bdddf
    https://brainmass.com/history/african-american-history/miller-v-alabama-and-jackson-v-arkansas-587788

    Solution Preview

    http://fairsentencingofyouth.org/what-is-jlwop/the-supreme-court/miller-v-alabama/

    refer to http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/10-9646g2i8.pdf to read the cases of Miller v. Alabama and Jackson v. Arkansas (2012). Discuss these two cases as a differential way of dealing with juveniles being tried and sentenced as adults but not subject to all the rules of adult sentencing laws. justify your ideas and responses by citing appropriate examples from references within the texts, Web sites, and other resources or apply examples from personal experience

    Juveniles aren't fully functional adults who understand the totality of their decisions and are heavily influenced by their peers as well as by acting on impulses. Therefore, the Supreme ...

    Solution Summary

    444 words on the utilitarian and the deontological philosophies involved in these two cases.

    $2.19