Explore BrainMass

Explore BrainMass

    Fallacy Identifications within Context

    This content was COPIED from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

    I need to identify any examples of fallacies in the following passages. Can you please explain why you think these are fallacies, and identify which category they belong in, if they fit any category I've described.

    Slippery Slope
    Begging the question
    False dilemma
    Ad hominem
    Burden of proof
    Straw man

    2. Letter to the editor: "Andrea Keene's selective morality is once again showing through in her July 15 letter. This time she expresses her abhorrence of abortion. But how we see only what we choose to see! I wonder if any of the anti-abortionists have considered the widespread use of fertility drugs as the moral equivalent of abortion, and, if they have, why they haven't come out against them, too. The use of these drugs frequently results in multiple births, which leads to the death of one of the infants, often after an agonizing struggle for survival. According
    to the rules of the pro-lifers, isn't this murder?"

    3. In one of her columns, Abigail Van Buren printed the letter of "I'd rather be a widow." The letter writer, a divorcée, complained about widows who said they had a hard time coping. Far better, she wrote, to be a widow than to be a divorcée, who are all "rejects" who have been "publicly dumped" and are avoided "like they have leprosy." Abby recognized the pseudoreasoning for what it was, though she did not call it by our name. What is our name for it?

    5. Letter to the editor: "Once again the Park Commission is considering closing North Park Drive for the sake of a few joggers and bicyclists. These so-called fitness enthusiasts would evidently have us give up to them for their own private use every last square inch of Walnut Grove. Then anytime anyone wanted a picnic, he would have to park at the edge of the park and carry everything in?ice chests, chairs, maybe even grandma. I certainly hope the Commission keeps the entire park open for everyone to use."

    6. "Some Christian?and other?groups are protesting against the placing, on federal property near the White House, of a set of plastic figurines representing a devout Jewish family in ancient Judaea. The protestors would of course deny that they are driven by any anti-Semitic motivation. Still, we wonder: Would they raise the same objections (of unconstitutionality,
    etc.) if the scene depicted a modern, secularized Gentile family?

    8. From a letter to the editor: "The counties of Michigan clearly need the ability to raise additional sources of revenue, not only to meet the demands of growth but also to maintain existing levels of service. For without these sources those demands will not be met, and it will be impossible to maintain services even at present levels."

    9. In February 1992, a representative of the Catholic Church in Puerto Rico gave a radio interview (broadcast on National Public Radio) in which he said that the Church was against the use of condoms. Even though the rate of AIDS infection in Puerto Rico is much higher than on the U.S. mainland, the spokesman said that the Church could not support the use of condoms because they are not absolutely reliable in preventing the spread of the disease. "If you could prove that condoms were absolutely dependable in preventing a person from contracting AIDS, then the Church could support their use."

    © BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 9, 2019, 8:42 pm ad1c9bdddf

    Solution Preview

    2- Ad hominem- This fallacy involves three steps. First, the person needs to make a claim. Here, it is Andrea's view on abortion. Next, there is a direct attack upon the person making the claim. In this case, there is a direct attack against Andrea upon her view (But how we see only what we choose to see). Last, it is assumed that the claim made by the first person is false. Here, the claim about abortion made by Andrea is said to be false because it is compared to fertility drugs.

    3- False Dilemma- This fallacy says that one of two claims is true. If one claim is false, then the other must be true. Here we have the premise that being a widow is better than being a divorcee just because being a divorcee is bad. Therefore, being a widow must be good. The reasoning goes like this: 1) Either being a divorcee is worse or being a widow is worse. 2) Being a divorcee is bad 3) Being a widow must be good.

    5- ...