The Policy Research Paper should contain a comprehensive assessment of the problem, the proposed (or actual) policy, and the potential (or actual) consequences of implementation of that policy. When you write your paper, you should think of yourself as a staff person who must advise a policy maker facing a problem that must be resolved in the near future. As this staff person, adopt one of the perspectives of public management as presented in this module, and frame your responses around this approach.
The structure of public policy papers is different from typical papers and requires certain elements and sections in addition to the traditional thesis, introduction, and conclusion.
When writing your public policy paper, make sure to include the following sections:
Executive Summary: This goes at the very front of your paper and is a summary or abstract of your analysis. It is
essential that you include your policy recommendation here.
Introduction: Explains to your audience why the issue/policy you have chosen to investigate is important and
relevant and what the current policy is. References to other research done on this issue can be included here as
Criteria: Let the reader know what criteria you are using to evaluate your policies. Economic feasibility, political
feasibility, and environmental impact are common criteria. Criteria should also be unique to your chosen
Alternatives: These are the policies you are analyzing and evaluating in your paper. Alternative policies seek to
improve on current policy and/or approach issues from different perspectives. These alternatives are evaluated on
the criteria you have listed out above.
Projected Outcomes and Tradeoffs: This section can be included in the evaluation of each alternative policy or set
apart on its own. Much of your individual analysis and opinion falls under this section, as you are called upon to
not only predict the effects and efficiency of your policies, but also assess the negatives and positives of your
Recommendation and Discussion: Here is where you finally decide among your alternatives and advocate your
policy. Remember not to simply repeat what you have covered under Alternatives and Projected Outcomes and
Trade-offs, but explain why your client should follow your analysis and enact the policy you have chosen.
be a minimum of 700 words
In compliance with BrainMass rules this is not a hand in ready essay but is only guidance.
The policy 19 TAC §30.2003 has been proposed to help TEA comply with the state law. The law requires higher monitoring of important contracts, assessment of contract performance, and unannounced reviews of contracts. The criteria for assessing the implementation will include the number of reviews conducted, training provided to TEA employees, and tool made available to TEA employees. The result must be improved contract performance. One alternative is that an external auditor be appointed to monitor, audit, and review contracts, however, this alternative currently appears to be costly and poltically unacceptable.
The policy that has been selected is 19 TAC §30.2003. This policy has been proposed by the Texas Educational Agency. This policy is important because the Texas Legislature 2015 added Texas Government Code, §2261.253 which requires state agencies to set up procedures to identify each contract that requires enhanced contract or performance monitoring. In response the Texas Educational Agency has proposed 19 TAC §30.2003 that will implement the provision for auditing and monitoring performance on all contracts given by the Texas Educational Agency. The introduction and passing of 19 TAC §30.2003 is important because the Texas Educational Agency needs to comply with the new law passed by the Texas Legislature. The passing of 19 TAC §30.2003 is important because in ...
The response provides you a structured explanation of Texas Public Policy relating to education . It also gives you the relevant references.