Explore BrainMass
Share

Compensation: Pros & Cons of Disclosure

This content was STOLEN from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

Gueutal & Stone (2005) state that an organization's communication practices can have a profound effect on how employees respond to an organization's compensation practices and whether the organization gets what it wants. Assess the pros and cons of your organization's communication approach in regard to compensation practices. Offer a different strategy that would provide more value to your organization as well as its employees. Provide specific examples to support your response.

© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 25, 2018, 10:10 am ad1c9bdddf
https://brainmass.com/business/human-resources-management/compensation-pros-cons-disclosure-600717

Solution Preview

It is not uncommon for government agencies, whether Federal, State or Local (such as public safety, department of transportation, etc.) to advertise positions with salaries. Often when taxpayers are essentially funding (via taxes) government operations, there are public disclosure laws wherein compensation is no secret. Additionally, public sector employees are often represented by unions, with the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) also subject of public disclosures. There are pros and cons to having such readily available information on compensation.

The first pro is potential employees are aware of pay structures - and know what to expect. If a ...

Solution Summary

This solution is over 400 words and provides several pros and cons of an "open" compensation program. The examples provided are from the perspective of public sector, government employees. Compensation is often disclosed in the hiring process, and employees typically know what their peers are paid. This can create morale issues, and also public scrutiny. The solution explains why disclosure of compensation can be beneficial using "real world" examples.

$2.19
See Also This Related BrainMass Solution

How much power is too much?

I have been asked to discuss the pros and cons of public health officers/ environmental health officer having powers to force people to take action to prevent the spread of communicable diseases. I am to develop a conclusion about the appropriateness of the act and regulation in today's society.

This is due to a civil liberties group expressing concern over the public health act, and communicable disease control regulations. There issue is that the provisions of the legislation are too draconian in the powers granted to public health officials.

View Full Posting Details