Audit and common fraud
Not what you're looking for?
If some frauds are deemed common, should auditors be held liable if they do not find a common fraud? Why or why not?
Purchase this Solution
Solution Summary
This solution explains why an auditor should be held liable for not detecting a common fraud, addressing ethical principles and fraudulent activity.
Solution Preview
Yes, an auditor should be held liable for not detecting a common fraud because he is bound by ethical principles of his profession to report any detectable fraudulent activity in an organization, no matter how minuscule it might seem at a surface level.
Suppose that a business development manager in a printer manufacturing company uses official telephone for private purposes, say calling ...
Purchase this Solution
Free BrainMass Quizzes
Motivation
This tests some key elements of major motivation theories.
Learning Lean
This quiz will help you understand the basic concepts of Lean.
Understanding the Accounting Equation
These 10 questions help a new student of accounting to understand the basic premise of accounting and how it is applied to the business world.
Social Media: Pinterest
This quiz introduces basic concepts of Pinterest social media
Marketing Research and Forecasting
The following quiz will assess your ability to identify steps in the marketing research process. Understanding this information will provide fundamental knowledge related to marketing research.