Explore BrainMass

Jefferson Motors, other financial statement questions

This content was STOLEN from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

1)Identify which financial statement would help answer the questions below -

Bal. Sheet Income Stmt. Stmt. Of cash flows Statement of stockholders' equity
Is the firm generating enough cash to repay is debt to invest in new products?
Does the firm generate enough internal funds to support investment, or does new stock need to be issued?
Is the firm financed with too much debt?
How profitable has the firm been?
Can the firm meet all its short -term obligations?
How much of the firm's earnings are put back into the company for reinvestment, and how much is paid out as dividends?

2)The balance sheet lists a variety of claims against a firm's assets. Claims against assets are either liability of equity claims (assuming nor preferred stock). Shareholder's equity represents an ownership on the firm's assets, while a liability claim does not imply ownership. It must be paid paid. However, some liabilities tend to arise naturally through the firm's business operations. Identify which of the following liability accounts are liabilities that naturally occur as the business operates. Check all that apply.

Long-term debt
Notes Payable
Accounts Payable - we picked this one.

3)At the end of last year, Jefferson Motors had 100,000 shares of common stock with a balance of $185,000, retained earnings of $710,000 and total stockholder's equity of $895,000. This year, Jefferson paid a dividen of $80,000 and its end-of-year retained earnings were $795,000. What was the net income of Jefferson Motors for this year?

$140,000, $165,000, $155,000 $150,000 or $145,000

4)Net sales 80,000
Opr. Cost except
Depreciation 60,000
EBITDA 20,000

Dep. Exp. 4,000

EBIT 16,000

Less Int. Exp. 3,000

EBT 13,000

Taxes 5,200

Net Income 7,800

*Net income for next yr. needs to be $9,900, assume the tax rate remains at 40%, opr. Costs except dep. Expense remain at 75% of sales, and there is no effect on the dep. Or int. expenses. What sales goal must be met in order to reach the net income of $9,900 next year?

94,000 106,000 $90,000 $86,000 $98,000

4)Taxable income of $320,000 and the company has the corp. tax rates below

0-50,000 15%
50,000-75,000 25%
75,000-100,000 34%
100,000-335,000 39%
335,000-10,000,000 34%
10,000,000-15,000,000 35%
15,000,000 - 18,333,333 38%
Over $18,333,333 35%

What is the tax liability?
108,050, 104,540, 103,370,
88,550 or 106,880? We picked 103,370

Marginal tax rate:
33%, 34%, 35%, 38% or 39%

Avg. tax rate?
34%, 33%, 35%, 38%, 39%

Which of the following two tax rates has the most economic significance for Jehle's financial dec. making process?

Avg. or Marginal?

© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 25, 2018, 5:33 am ad1c9bdddf


Solution Preview

1. Please adjust according to these comments:
Generating enough cash? Yes, Cash flow statement
Enough internal funds? This should also be cash flow statement.
Too much debt? Need income statement and balance sheet to compute debt to equity and times interest earned.
Profitable -- that's fine (income statement)
Short term ...

Solution Summary

Comments and computations provided for you.

See Also This Related BrainMass Solution

An Illustration of Relevant Costs for Decision Making

An Illustration of Relevant Costs for Decision-Making

The concepts of incremental cost, opportunity cost, sunk cost, and cost allocation are identified and discussed in the context of early U.S. foreign policy. The case is derived from an authentic exchange of views between Thomas Jefferson and John Adams on how the United States should protect its merchant shipping against the Barbary Pirates. Both men compare the cost of waging war against the pirates with the cost of paying ransom for captured U.S. seamen and bribes to protect future shipping. Adams quantifies the opportunity cost associated with not taking any action against the pirates. Jefferson articulates an incremental costing argument, on the assumption that the U.S. should build a navy regardless of U.S. policy towards the Barbary States. The case constitutes a brief introduction to management accounting by illustrating different cost concepts, and also lends itself to a discussion of the historical origins of management accounting.

The beginning of wisdom in using accounting for decision-making is a clear understanding that the relevant costs and revenues are those which as between the alternatives being considered are expected to be different in the future. It has taken accountants a long time to grasp this essential point.
R. H. Parker (1969, 15)

The Barbary Pirates
Throughout the 17th and 18th centuries, the North African Barbary States of Morocco, Algiers, Tunis and Tripoli engaged in piracy of European merchant shipping. The Barbary pirates routinely captured and confiscated ships and cargo, and enslaved or ransomed their crews and passengers. England, France and Spain entered into treaties with the Barbary States, in effect, paying "protection money" for their merchant shipping. These powerful European nations preferred bribery to war, because they perceived an economic benefit from the threat the pirates posed to the merchant shipping of other European nations.
Until the Revolutionary War, merchant ships from the American Colonies were protected by the British Royal Navy and by the treaties between England and the Barbary States. American shipping lost this protection in 1783, and within the next two years three American ships were captured, one by Morocco and two by Algiers. Morocco soon freed the American crew in exchange for a ransom of 5,000 pounds sterling (about $25,000).1 The crews held by the Algerians were captive throughout 1786 and for some time thereafter.

Historical Background
The capture of American ships by the Barbary pirates created an early and important foreign policy crisis for the United States. The U.S. response to the Barbary crisis was strongly influenced by two factors, one military and the other financial. The military consideration was that the U.S. had no navy. The Continental Navy of the Revolutionary War was disbanded in 1784, and the navy was not reestablished until 1798. During the intervening years, the United States had minimal naval power. Disbanding the Continental Navy was primarily a cost-savings measure. However, there were also important non-financial arguments for and against the navy. Some Americans who favored reestablishing close ties with England feared that the presence of a U.S. navy on the high seas would lead to confrontations with the British Navy. Other Americans, including John Adams, viewed a strong navy as the best national defense against foreign threats. Many Americans preferred the prospect of building a navy over an army due to their general distrust of standing armies?the result of their experience with the British occupation in America during the latter part of the Colonial Era.
The financial factor that influenced the U.S. response to the Barbary pirates was that any effective response would require a significant expense relative to the government's available funds. The U.S. government found itself in a precarious financial condition in the years immediately following the Revolutionary War. The Continental Congress and individual states borrowed over $40 million to finance the war, including about $6 million from France. From 1781 to 1788, the period during which the United States operated under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government did not have the power to tax its citizens, levy tariffs, or regulate commerce. The cost of operating the government during this time was about $500,000 annually, not including funding the debt (Hicks et al. 1970, 103). Some income was generated by the post office and from sales of public lands, but the two principal revenue sources available to the government were requesting support from the states and issuing paper money. State contributions to the federal government constituted only a small fraction of what was needed, and issuing paper money was an inflationary measure that had already been used extensively during the Revolutionary War. The financial plight of the new nation was sufficiently acute that during this period, the government borrowed from foreign sources just to meet the interest obligations on existing foreign debt.
The ratification of the Constitution in 1788 greatly enhanced the powers of the Federal government, and allowed the new Congress to levy and collect duties and taxes. However, the ability of the new government to actually enact and enforce revenue-generating measures was untested, and evolved over time. In 1786, during the Confederation period, and again in 1794, during Washington's presidency, popular opposition to taxation led to civil unrest. The first incident, Shays' Rebellion, arose in Massachusetts when the State Legislature levied taxes to pay off the war debt. The second incident, the Whiskey Rebellion, occurred in Western Pennsylvania when the federal government imposed an excise tax on distilled liquor. Also, although the Federal government had more potential resources under the Constitution than under the Articles of Confederation, it soon had more obligations. In 1790, under a plan advanced by Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton, the federal government assumed the remaining war debts that were owed by the individual states.
However, despite financial tribulations at both the state and federal levels, economic conditions in the United States during this period were generally good. A short recession that occurred after the Revolutionary War was followed by a period of economic growth. The strong economy led to increased federal revenues, and that fact, combined with the success of American leaders in keeping the nation out of the growing conflict between England and France, enabled the government to become current on its obligations under the national debt during Jefferson's administration.

The Adams-Jefferson Correspondence
In 1786, John Adams was the leading U.S. diplomat in London, and Thomas Jefferson was the U.S. ambassador to France. A few years earlier, in 1784, the Continental Congress had authorized Adams and Jefferson to negotiate treaties with the Barbary States (Kitzen 1993, 10). Consequently, the responsibility to negotiate the release of the captured American seamen, and to establish U.S. foreign policy that would protect U.S. shipping in the Mediterranean, fell largely to these two men. Against this backdrop, Adams sent Jefferson a letter that included the following analysis:

Adams to Jefferson
Grosvenor Square, June 6, 1786

Dear Sir

... The first Question is, what will it cost us to make Peace with all five [Barbary States]? Set it if you will at five hundred Thousand Pounds Sterling, tho I doubt not it might be done for Three or perhaps for two.
The Second Question is, what Damage shall we suffer, if we do not treat.
Compute Six or Eight Per Cent Insurance upon all your Exports, and Imports.
Compute the total Loss of all the Mediterranean and Levant Trade.
Compute the Loss of half your Trade to Portugal and Spain.
These computations will amount to more than half a Million sterling a year.
The third Question is what will it cost to fight them? I answer, at least half a Million sterling a year without protecting your Trade, and when you leave off fighting you must pay as much Money as it would cost you now for Peace.
The Interest of half a Million Sterling is, even at Six Per Cent, Thirty Thousand Guineas a year. For an Annual Interest of 30,000 pounds sterling then and perhaps for 15,000 or 10,000, we can have Peace, when a War would sink us annually ten times as much. (Cappon 1959, 133-134)

In the last paragraph of the excerpt, Adams states interest expense in terms of guineas. A guinea was worth about one pound sterling. Jefferson responded to Adams a few weeks later:
Jefferson to Adams
Paris, July 11, 1786I need some help with the questions at the end of the case study.

(See attached file for full problem description)

View Full Posting Details