See attached file for tables.
1) Last month, Lloyd's Systems analyzed the project whose cash flows are shown below. However, before the decision to accept or reject the project took place, the Federal Reserve changed interest rates and therefore the firm's WACC. The Fed's action did not affect the forecasted cash flows. By how much did the change in the WACC affect the project's forecasted NPV? Note that a project's expected NPV can be negative, in which case it should be rejected.
2) A firm is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. The CEO wants to use the IRR criterion, while the CFO favors the NPV method. You were hired to advise the firm on the best procedure. If the wrong decision criterion is used, how much potential value would the firm lose?
3) Yonan Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the shorter payback, some value may be forgone. How much value will be lost in this instance? Note that under some conditions choosing projects on the basis of the shorter payback will not cause value to be lost.© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 17, 2018, 3:30 am ad1c9bdddf
Problems on Capital Budgeting involving NPV, IRR, Payback criteria.
Project evaluation processes- Payback, NPV, PI, IRR
Can someone please describe the following project evaluation processes for me: Payback, NPV, PI, IRR. Is any one evaluation process better the others? Why?View Full Posting Details