Purchase Solution

Theresa liable to pay Paulette

Not what you're looking for?

Ask Custom Question

Discussion Questions

1. On a clear Saturday morning, Steven has begun to cut the lawn at his home. He is unable to trim some weeds he finds in his backyard, because the weeds have grown between the rocks, so he goes to his garage and takes out his newly purchased weed trimmer. Seeing the protective guard Steven removes it from the weed trimmer and begins to trim the weeds. There are no warnings on the weed trimmer advising against the removal of the protective guard. Unfortunately Steven hits a rock, which is thrown to the side, hitting his neighbor, Jonathan, in the face and causing permanent damage to his left eye. Jonathan had been standing in the abutting yard doing some yard work as well. Based on the text, what tort claims does the neighbor, Jonathan, have? Who are the possible defendants that Jonathan would include in the lawsuit? Explain with legal reasoning and analysis.

2. Paulette is the owner of the Rock On Mobile Home Park. For several years, Albert regularly collected rent for Paulette from the tenants of the mobile home park. Recently, Paulette learned that Albert pocketed some rent he collected, so Paulette fired Albert, and revoked his authority to collect rent payments from tenants. However, neither Paulette nor Albert told any tenants of Albert's termination. Yesterday, Albert went around to Theresa's mobile home and asked for the rent. Theresa paid Albert the money owed to Paulette. Albert never gave this money to Paulette. Is Theresa liable to pay Paulette? Why or why not? What legal principle(s) did you apply? In your response also discuss an agent's obligations toward the principal.

Purchase this Solution

Solution Summary

This answer provides you an excellent discussion on whether Theresa is liable to pay Paulette

Solution Preview

1.

The tort claims that neighbor Jonathan has against Steven is negligence. Steven had duty of care but he did not exercise it be removing the protective cover. The legal point is that there was a breach of duty and that led to harm to Jonathan. Steven is the direct cause (factual causation) as well as the legal causation for the injury caused to Jonathan.
The other defendant that Jonathan would include in ...

Solution provided by:
Education
  • BSc , University of Calcutta
  • MBA, Eastern Institute for Integrated Learning in Management
Recent Feedback
  • "I read your comments, and thank you for this feedback. Do I need to find other studies that applied this methodology Ive used? That's where I'm stuck at."
  • "Thank you kindly sir. "
  • "Excellent and well explained. --Thank you kindly. "
  • "Awesome notes. I appreciate you."
  • "I have the follow-up project and I will assign that to you very soon. "
Purchase this Solution


Free BrainMass Quizzes
Organizational Behavior (OB)

The organizational behavior (OB) quiz will help you better understand organizational behavior through the lens of managers including workforce diversity.

Understanding Management

This quiz will help you understand the dimensions of employee diversity as well as how to manage a culturally diverse workforce.

Paradigms and Frameworks of Management Research

This quiz evaluates your understanding of the paradigm-based and epistimological frameworks of research. It is intended for advanced students.

Lean your Process

This quiz will help you understand the basic concepts of Lean.

Business Ethics Awareness Strategy

This quiz is designed to assess your current ability for determining the characteristics of ethical behavior. It is essential that leaders, managers, and employees are able to distinguish between positive and negative ethical behavior. The quicker you assess a person's ethical tendency, the awareness empowers you to develop a strategy on how to interact with them.