Explore BrainMass

Explore BrainMass

    IBP v. Alvarez and Tum v. Barbar Foods

    This content was COPIED from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

    Read the following cases: IBP v. Alvarez (http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-9th-circuit/1335503.html) and Tum v. Barbar Foods (http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-1st-circuit/1158592.html). These cases were litigated all the way to the Supreme Court. What, if any, practical impact might these ruling have on businesses? Why do you think that these issues were litigated all the way to the Supreme Court?

    © BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com June 4, 2020, 4:11 am ad1c9bdddf

    Solution Preview

    In Alvarez v. IBP, employees of the meat processing plant sought compensation for the time it
    took to put on and take off special protective garments and safety gear, which were mandatory for them
    to complete their jobs. The Court ofAppeals, 9th District determined these activities to be compensable,
    due to the fact that the processes involved more than simply changing clothes. IBP argued that a prior
    case set precedent, in that the plaintiff's argument was correct. However, in the prior case, employees
    were non-unionized. IBP argued that because employees belonged to a bargaining unit, they had
    adequate representation through collective bargaining and the circumstances were different ...

    Solution Summary

    The expert determines the ways cases are litigated by the supreme court.