Contracts Law
Not what you're looking for?
Sarah entered into a written contract with Safe Storage Incorporated. The agreement included a clause excusing Safe Storage from any liability for loss or damage, even if the loss or damage resulted from Safe Storage's negligent acts. Sarah signed the agreement. A fire destroyed the warehouse and all of its contents, including Sarah's household goods and furniture. Sarah claims that Safe Storage is liable for the full value of the contents, which is approximately $10,000.
If the fire was not the result of Safe Storage's negligence, is Sarah correct?
If the fire was a result of Safe Storage's negligence, is Sarah correct?
Purchase this Solution
Solution Summary
This solution explains if Safe Storage is responsible for the items damaged in the fire, and if Sarah is correct.
Solution Preview
If the fire was not the result of Safe Storage's negligence, is Sarah correct?
Yes, Sarah is correct to the extent that the responsible party would be liable for the damages to Sarah's property. In cases of fire or other intentional damage, the responsible party would have to pay for the damage. If I do something that ruins someone else's property, my ...
Purchase this Solution
Free BrainMass Quizzes
Learning Lean
This quiz will help you understand the basic concepts of Lean.
Organizational Leadership Quiz
This quiz prepares a person to do well when it comes to studying organizational leadership in their studies.
SWOT
This quiz will test your understanding of the SWOT analysis, including terms, concepts, uses, advantages, and process.
Income Streams
In our ever changing world, developing secondary income streams is becoming more important. This quiz provides a brief overview of income sources.
Balance Sheet
The Fundamental Classified Balance Sheet. What to know to make it easy.