Explore BrainMass
Share

Immanuel Kant's view on the ethical principles of human rights

This content was STOLEN from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) is one of the most influential philosophers in the history of Western philosophy. His contributions to metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, and aesthetics have had a profound impact on almost every philosophical movement that followed him. However, most of Kant's work on ethics is presented in two works. The Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals (1785) is Kant's "search for and establishment of the supreme principle of morality." In The Critique of Practical Reason (1787) Kant attempts to unify his account of practical reason with his work in the Critique of Pure Reason.

I understand his views on freedom and how it plays a central role in Kant's ethics because the possibility of moral judgments presupposes it. Freedom is an idea of reason that serves an indispensable practical function. Without the assumption of freedom, reason can not act but I'm very on unclear on how this all ties into human rights.

© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 25, 2018, 9:38 am ad1c9bdddf
https://brainmass.com/business/business-ethics/immanuel-kant-s-view-on-the-ethical-principles-of-human-rights-581443

Solution Preview

Immanuel Kant's view on the ethical principles of human rights

Kant's view on the ethical principles of human rights is predicated upon his belief that every human has the autonomy to choose right or ...

Solution Summary

This solution provides a brief explanation of Immanuel Kant's view on the ethical principles of human rights.

$2.19
See Also This Related BrainMass Solution

Immanuel Kant's categorical imperative is meant to be a universal principle, that is, a principle for all persons at all time periods in all societies.

Immanuel Kant's categorical imperative is meant to be a universal principle, that is, a principle for all persons at all time periods in all societies. Both ethical relativists and ethical skeptics deny that there is any such universally valid principle. Discuss the issues that both groups raise in their objections to the categorical imperative.

View Full Posting Details