Refer to the Geographical Analysis (Oct. 2006) study of a new method for analyzing remote sensing data from satellite pixels, Exercise 6.25 (p. 335). Recall that the method uses a numerical measure of the distribution of gaps or hole sizes in the pixel, called lucanarity. Summary statistics for the lacunarity measirements in a sample of 100 grassland pixels are x* (this should be an x with a line over it (the mean))= 225 and s = 20. As stated in Exercise 6.25 it is known that the mean lucanarity measurement for all grassland pixels is 220. The method will be effective in identifying land cover if the standard deviation of the measurements is 10% (or less) of the true mean, i.e., if the standard deviation is less than 22.

a) Give the null and alternative hypothesis for a test to determine if, in fact, the standard deviation of all grassland pixels is less than 22.

b) A Minitab analysis of the data is shown at the bottom of the page. Locate and interpret the p-value of the test. Use ? = .10.

NEW: Problem 6.25 from page 335: (this does not need to be completed--only the problem above needs to be completed. I just added the problem below for reference if needed)

For planning purposes, urban land-cover must be identified as either grassland, commercial, or residential. This is typically done using remote sensing data from satellite pictures. In "Geographical Analysis" (Oct. 2006), researchers from Arizona State, Florida State, and Louisiana State Universities collaborated on a new method for analyzing remote sensing data. A satellite photograph of an urban area was divided into 4x4 meter areas (called pixels). Of interest is a numerical measure of the distribution of gaps or hole sizes in the pixel, called lucanarity. The mean and standard deviation of the lucanarity measurements for a sample of 100 pixels randomly selected from a specific urban area are 225 and 20, respectively. It is knowh that the mean lucanarity measurement for all grassland pixels is 220. Do the data suggest that the area sampled is grassland? Test at ? = .01

Solution Preview

(a) Null hypothesis is Ho: The standard deviation is 22 or greater

Alternative hypothesis is Ha: The standard deviation is less than 22

(b) Test for One ...

Solution Summary

Complete, Neat and Step-by-step Solutions are provided.

how are mean, standarddeviation, coefficient of variation, relative error, and 95% confidence interval affected by sample size (n=5, n=10), larger size of the measurement (1ml vs. 10 ml)? Which sample size is better and which size of measurement is better?

Consider that measurement 2 (M2) in a random sample of 1000 controls from the Disease Y study population follows the normal distribution. The sample mean of M2 is 90 and 95% of the sample observation falls within 70 and 110. Calculate the sample standarddeviation and standard error of the sample mean and intepret.
I would

The reliability coefficient for a test is determined to be 0.84. The standarddeviation is 11. The mean for the test is 54. What is the maximum validity for the test?
What is the standard error of measurement for the test?
What range of scores would you expect an individual who made 54 on the test to make on another tes

What does standarddeviation measure? In looking at the standarddeviations of the "with fireplace" and "without fireplace" selling prices, one is much larger than the other. What could cause the standarddeviations to be so different?

Returns for the Shields Company over the last 3 years are shown below. What's the standarddeviation of Shields' returns? (Hint: This is a sample, not a complete population, so the sample standarddeviation formula should be used.)
Year
Return
2006
2

The problem I am having trouble figuring out is the following:
Suppose that a process with a normally distributed output has a mean of 55.0 and a variance of 4.0.
a. If the specifications are 55.0 +/- 4.00, compute Cp, Cpk,Cpm.
b. Suppose the mean shifts to 53.0 but the variance remains unchanged. Recompute and interpret

Two craps tables collect an average of $500 per hour. One table has a standarddeviation of $50 while the other has a standarddeviation of $150. What conclusion can be drawn from the data? Normally, would one want a larger of smaller standarddeviation? Please discuss and show any work associated with this question. Thanks