Wilson v. Layne, Deputy United States Marshal (1999)

Related BrainMass Solutions

• Judicial Review & Judicial Precedent: Wilson vs. Layne

  As the case of WILSON et al. v. LAYNE, DEPUTY UNITED STATES MARSHAL, et al. presented, the case has had no precedent.

• International relations and U.S. power

  Reading & Resources Layne, Chistopher. 1993. "The Unipolar Illusion: Why New Great Powers Will Rise." International Security 17.4: 5-51. http://ezproxy.apus.edu/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539020 Wohlforth, William C.1999.

• Full Timeline of the Panama Canal

  President Jimmy Carter and Torrijos sign treaty in Washington on September 7 that promises the United States will hand control of the waterway to Panama on December 31, 1999.

• United States and Canada Social & Economic Comparisons

  Canada has 31.3 times more French speaking people and 0.3% more Chinese speakers per capita as compared to the United States (Wilson, 2011).

• The Life of Wyatt Earp

  Earp is described as a decent, clean living, well mannered man who avoided the dangers of alcohol.(21) In 1929, Jimmy Cairns who had worked as a deputy marshal in Wichita with Earp gave his opinion of his former partner.

• Marshall Plan

  When the Marshal Plan ended giving economic aid in 1952, Europe had a solid economic base and a strong allegiance with the United States against the Soviet Union. Sources: Ayers, Edward L., Lewis L. Could et al.

• United States Neutrality in WWI

  With respect to WWI, the United States President, Woodrow Wilson, declared U.S. neutrality in August 1914.

• Timeline of US involvement in World War I

  A comprehensive timeline of the United States involvement with World War I.

• World War I, the Great War, is assessed

  As a result of the decision by the US Congress not to ratify the Versailles Treaty, the United States never joined the League of Nations. Others joined but later left the organization.