Purchase Solution

Is there a need for Miranda and Judicial Process?

Not what you're looking for?

Ask Custom Question

Television depicts several law enforcement programs in which criminals admit or confess to crimes without being read their rights. Because of this, many cases are thrown out even though the evidence points to the accused.

How do you feel about Miranda? Do you feel it is just in ALL cases?

Purchase this Solution
Solution Summary

Understanding the role and need of Miranda Rights and comparing real life to TV law show depictions.

Solution Preview

ABSOLUTELY! As much as it would be horrible to lose a case where the evidence strongly shows that the suspect committed the crime just because someone didn't properly inform a suspect of their rights - we have to question...if it were allowed...or an exception were ...

Purchase this Solution
Free BrainMass Quizzes
Evidence

Do you know your evidence objections? Find out with this quiz!

Title VII

This Quiz pertains to the spectrum of Human Rights through Title VII

Constitutional Law Rights

How much do you know about Constitutional Law Rights? Find out with this quiz!

Contract Requirments

How much do you know about the legal requirements for a contract? Find out with this quiz!

Title VII Laws

Learn the basics of the laws under Title VII.

View More Free Quizzes
Related BrainMass Solutions

  • Miranda Warning

    Thanks for choosing Brainmass and best of luck with your studies! One of the most historical cases in judicial history, the basis of this case involved Ernesto Miranda and the State of Arizona.

  • Interview, Interrogation and the Miranda Law

    Miranda law is not offense-specific; it doesn't matter if the offense is a felony or misdemeanor. Thanks for using BrainMass.

  • Confessions, Interrogations, and Three Constitutional Amendments

    are undergoing this judicial process.

  • Miranda Rights

    Justice Breyer framed the issue in the following way: What reasonable person brought to a police station by his parents at police request, put in a small interrogation room, questioned for a solid two hours, and confronted with claims that there is

  • Protecting Citizens Against Abuses of Government Power: U.S. Supreme Court vs. U.S. Congress

    Since Miranda has been applied against the states for almost forty years since its inception, how can it be credibly be argued that it is just a rule for federal courts?

  • A Brief History of Miranda Warnings

    The Miranda Warnings was a judicial response to a 1966 case involving Ernesto Miranda a mentally disturbed man with a ninth grade education from Arizona who confessed to kidnapping and rape of a young girl.

  • The Case of Ernesto Miranda

    One of the most historical cases in judicial history, the basis of this case involved Ernesto Miranda and the State of Arizona. Miranda was arrested and questioned for nearly two hours by detectives on rape and kidnapping charges.

  • Two Types of Supreme Court Decisions

    During the judicial process, individuals or organizations may feel that they did not receive the proper ruling and therefore often appeal to the highest court, which is the Supreme Court.

  • History and Criminal Justice

    How might nonverbal communication assist a probation and parole officer when he or she is assigned a new parolee? What behaviors would the officer need to look for?

  • Miranda Warnings

    When should the Miranda warnings be given and why? All police need to legally arrest a person is "probable cause" -- an adequate reason based on facts and events to believe the person has committed a crime.

View More Related Solutions