Purchase Solution

Standard of Proof

Not what you're looking for?

Ask Custom Question

Damian M. was charged with the murder of his wife, Sharon. After a lengthy trial in criminal court, he was acquitted by a jury of his wife's murder. Sharon's parents were convinced that Damian killed their daughter, and so they then brought a civil case against Damian for the wrongful death of their daughter. The jury in the civil case determined that Damian was responsible for the death of Sharon.

As a training exercise, you are asked to provide an analysis of how both a civil and criminal case could be brought against Damian for the death of his wife. Discuss possible explanations for the different outcomes in the cases - that one jury found that he had killed Sharon and the other did not. In your discussion, you need to address the following issues:

Explain the differences between civil and criminal law, such as standard of proof, who brings the case, and the basic possible punishments/repercussions for the defendant who loses the case.
How might the different standards of proof contribute to different outcomes (finding that Damian did or didn't commit kill Sharon) in the cases?

please identified and explain the two standards of proof or how the two different standards might have contributed to the different outcomes in the two cases.

Purchase this Solution

Solution Summary

Damian M. was charged with the murder of his wife, Sharon. After a lengthy trial in criminal court, he was acquitted by a jury of his wife's murder. Sharon's parents were convinced that Damian killed their daughter, and so they then brought a civil case against Damian for the wrongful death of their daughter. The jury in the civil case determined that Damian was responsible for the death of Sharon.

As a training exercise, you are asked to provide an analysis of how both a civil and criminal case could be brought against Damian for the death of his wife. Discuss possible explanations for the different outcomes in the cases - that one jury found that he had killed Sharon and the other did not. In your discussion, you need to address the following issues:

Explain the differences between civil and criminal law, such as standard of proof, who brings the case, and the basic possible punishments/repercussions for the defendant who loses the case.
How might the different standards of proof contribute to different outcomes (finding that Damian did or didn't commit kill Sharon) in the cases?

Solution Preview

Dear student:

As OTAs, we can assist in helping you understand the issues, provide examples and reference links to expand your knowledge on the subject. In this case, I address criminal law, civil law, the penalities and the burdens of proof for each form of the law. I also provide an excellent reference source to asisst you in your studies.

Thank you.

This case is a mirror image of the OJ Simpson case where he was found not guilty in a criminal court and guilty in a civil court.

How can this happen? In a ...

Solution provided by:
Education
  • Master of Business Administration, University of Phoenix
  • Bachelor of Science in Paralegal Studies, Kaplan College
  • Business Diploma, Katharine Gibbs Business College for Women
Recent Feedback
  • "Thank you!!!"
  • "Thank you"
  • "Thank you so much "
  • "Thank you very much"
  • "Thank you so much "
Purchase this Solution


Free BrainMass Quizzes
Title VII

This Quiz pertains to the spectrum of Human Rights through Title VII

Constitutional Law Rights

How much do you know about Constitutional Law Rights? Find out with this quiz!

Title VII Laws

Learn the basics of the laws under Title VII.

Contract Requirments

How much do you know about the legal requirements for a contract? Find out with this quiz!

Evidence

Do you know your evidence objections? Find out with this quiz!