Purchase Solution

Eminent domain and Kelo vs. City of New London

Not what you're looking for?

Ask Custom Question

Over 200 word essay with reference that describes eminent domain in the case of Kelo vs City of New London.

Purchase this Solution
Solution Summary

Over 200 word essay with reference that describes eminent domain in the case of Kelo vs City of New London.

Solution Preview

The use of eminent domain by states has been an issue that opens argumentative lines of discussion between all parties involved. Eminent domain is defined as a power shared by all state and federal governments to take private land for public use by paying for it. However, it's been highly regarded as unconstitutional because it's believed that the level of government in question only pays bottom dollar for the property and not true market value. Case in point is that of Kelo vs. City of New ...

Purchase this Solution
Free BrainMass Quizzes
Contract Requirments

How much do you know about the legal requirements for a contract? Find out with this quiz!

Constitutional Law Rights

How much do you know about Constitutional Law Rights? Find out with this quiz!

Criminal Defenses Review

Test your knowledge of the basics of criminal law and defenses with this quiz.

Title VII

This Quiz pertains to the spectrum of Human Rights through Title VII

Title VII Laws

Learn the basics of the laws under Title VII.

View More Free Quizzes
Related BrainMass Solutions

  • Eminent Domain and the Kelo v. City of New London Case

    345110 Kelo vs. City of New London summary The case of Kelo vs. City of New London recently gave the US Supreme Court the opportunity to deal with the main issues involved in the exercise of the power of eminent domain.

  • Kelo case and the majority opinion

    The city of New London used its power under eminent domain to condemn Kelo's real property and transfer the title (ownership) to a private developer (Kubasek, Brennan, & Browne, 2009).

  • Lawyer Case Study: NASA

    City of New London. In these decisions, the Court set a precedent that enables the use of eminent domain for economic development purposes and to beautify a community.

  • Public Use for Profit

    City of New London (2005) The issue here is a real estate developer seizing land, in New London, CT, for the sake of new construction (urban renewal). The city, in other words, just took this property and gave it over to new development.

  • The Takings Clause

    After Kelo v. City of New London even though the power of eminent domain has become limitless and providing little means to protect their property, the residents put up a strong fight and the Pfizer plant was abandoned after four years.

  • Eminent Domain Powers

    But after the 2005 court decision in the New London, Connecticut case, the situation would be different today, due to the fact that the Supreme Court has ruled that the the city of New London had the right to use eminent domain powers for the purpose

  • Property and Consumer Law

    520840 Property and Consumer Law Case Summary Kelo V. City of New London, Connecticut FACTS: New London, Connecticut, was declining economically.

  • This posting discusses the Kelo v City of New London case

    Here's a link to a discussion on wikipedia about the case of Kelo v. City of New London: Kelo v City of New London http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelo_v.

  • Ethics and the Law

    New London case stipulated that cities have the right to condemn, and to subsequently transfer the property of private owners, if this activity will produce some economic growth benefit for the city and or its citizens.

View More Related Solutions