Do court rulings that prevent plant closures benefit the community?

Related BrainMass Solutions

• Divorce proceedings and a shareholder agreement

  Basically, the other shareholders want to be able to approve of who - or where - the stock is being sold to, by the current shareholder. Agreements like these do not generally include actions by a court.

• Case Law Rulings and Legislative Acts in Psychology Practice

  Chapter 6 Confidentiality and Legal Issues Eighth Edition Brooks/Cole Gengage Learning This solution gave several court rulings that affected how various rules and regulations have changed and how social workers and counselors do their work.

• Interventions for Domestic Violence

  The social worker should also let the word out in the community of the possibility of violence so that neighbors and community members are aware of the possibility of violence and play a proactive role in preventing it.

• Issues in Taxation - Multiple choice questions

  business expenses 7) Which judicial doctrine means that a court will rule consistently with its previous rulings and the rulings of higher courts with appellate jurisdiction? A. The Goldman rule B. Stare decisis C.

• Employment Law - Parental leave

  The Court decided that because the woman (Allen) could have been fired simply for taking unauthorized breaks to pump milk the notion that lactation wouldn't be covered under PDA, which has happened in previous court rulings, did not need to be ascertained

• eminent domain under the 5th Amendment

  For example, the Michigan Supreme Court allowed property to be condemned in order to allow the General Motors Company to use the land under the theory that the public would benefit from the economic revitalization a new plant would bring to the community

• The Internal Revenue Code (IRC) is the supreme source of inc

  If court cases conflict in their rulings, which ruling should you rely on and why? If court cases conflict in their rulings, the tax practitioner would rely on the case that is most similar to the IRC standard.

• Protecting Citizens Against Abuses of Government Power: U.S. Supreme Court vs. U.S. Congress

  Therefore, currently as well as historically, the U.S. Supreme Court has had to exert their power to prevent the Congressional branch from trampling on the rights of citizens.

• Judicial Activism in relation to the Canadian Supreme Court

  Also, they argue that judges often make rulings based on their own personal beliefs instead of legal precedent and the existing laws of the land.