Environmentalists argue that trade liberalization harms the environment. The decisions of the World Trade Organization (WTO) in particular have been the subject of much criticism.
1. Trade liberalization conflicts with morally-conscious environmental policies.
Note: I am "for" this statement. So the argument is to back up question #1's statement.© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 16, 2018, 5:49 pm ad1c9bdddf
Trade liberalization conflicts with morally-conscious environmental policies. The major issues that are leading to this are:
Externalities and cost internalization
'Externalities' is the economic term for the costs (e.g. environmental and social) of an economic activity which are not borne by the operator, but instead by the wider community. For example, if a forestry operation contributes to species loss or habitat destruction and these 'costs' are not somehow paid by the operator and thus reflected in the price of the final product, they will be 'paid' by the wider community - locally, nationally or globally. They are thus 'externalities'. The theoretical idea that trade benefits all is partly based on the assumption that externalities do not exist because prices reflect the true costs of production (i.e. the costs have been 'internalized').
Such an assumption is a fallacy; the environment is being damaged, costs are not 'internalized' and thus trade is not benefiting all. Many now recognize that, for the trade system to work properly, costs must be internalized.
But this recognition has not been turned into reality. This is partly because, if anything, the world trade system encourages competition to reduce costs (which can include actively externalizing them) rather than encouraging the internalization (and thus increase) of costs through taxes, regulations or other mechanisms.
Trade and specialization
One of the central pillars of trade theory is that countries will specialise in producing those products, which they are comparatively better at making relative to other products and other countries. On the one hand, such specialization allows a country to take advantage of ...
This discusses the trade liberalization conflicts with morally-conscious environmental policies.
Trade liberalization conflicts with morally-conscious environmental policies
Trade liberalization conflicts with morally-conscious environmental policies. While it is true that economic growth is necessary for general welfare and that economic growth requires the use of many natural resources that these resources are also affected, it is also true that only with moral conscious policies and rules that establish a priority the protection the environment, we can have a better world focused on the ecological protection.
What is the argument to support this?View Full Posting Details