Explore BrainMass
Share

Food Consumption and Global Warming

This content was STOLEN from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

How specifically does consuming organic vs non organic foods decrease global warming?

Specifically how does consuming organic foods positively affect the local ecosystem.
Is it this simple? ? I am assuming that by eating organic foods, you are eliminating the use of chemicals and pesticides. In doing this you reduce contamination of the water table and thus maintaining your ecosystem. Also can you explain how nitrogen is involved in contaminating the water (I am confused by this) Also by eating locally produced organic food you reduce the consumption of fossil fuels associated with food distribution and production. Can you specifically explain how this occurs?

© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 24, 2018, 8:41 pm ad1c9bdddf
https://brainmass.com/earth-sciences/agriculture-and-global-food-security/food-consumption-global-warming-104421

Solution Preview

You are correct in your assumptions about eating locally produced foods reducing emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases (the chemicals responsible for global warming, which mainly come from the burning of hydrocarbon fuels). Eliminating the use of fertilizers and pesticides is the major goal of organic farmers. These ideas alone do not seem to explain how eating organic foods can reduce global warming though. I think I will first answer your question about how nitrogen is involved in water contamination.

This is a good article about the risks of nitrogen in ...

Solution Summary

The solution discusses consuming inorganic versus organic foods and how that affects our environment.

$2.19
See Also This Related BrainMass Solution

Rain Forests: Global Warming and Food Production

Carbon dioxide in the atmosphere traps heat and warms the air, just as clear glass does in the greenhouse. Scientific evidence indicates that the carbon dioxide added to the air by the burning of wood and fossil fuels is contributing to the rise in global temperature. Tropical rain forests are estimated to be responsible for more than 20% of global photosynthesis. It seems resonable to expect that the rain forests would reduce global warming by consuming large amounts of carbon dioxide, but many experts now think that rain forests make little or no net contribution to reduction of global warming. Why might this be? Hint What happens to the food produced by a rain forest tree eaten by animals or the tree dies.

View Full Posting Details