President Bush imposed a tariff on foreign steel during his first mandate. Why? Who benefits? Who is hurt? What are the implications (future and present)?© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 16, 2018, 8:19 pm ad1c9bdddf
Let's take a closer look through discussion and example.
1. President Bush imposed a tariff on foreign steel during his first mandate? Why? Who benefits?
Interestingly, Bush, who campaigned as a free trade advocate, imposed protective steel tariffs of 30% on his first mandate.
Who benefits? Bush explained it this way: "This relief will help steelworkers, communities that depend upon steel, and the steel industry adjust without harming our economy."- President Bush (3/5/02). Specifically, it benefits the steel industry in Ohio, Pennsylvania and West Virginia; and some argue that President Bush benefited politically as the tariffs were part of the political strategy to get votes and seats in West Virginia.
Who is hurt?
a. The reputation of the United States is hurt when President Bush advocates for free trade (and expects other countries loyalties), but yet does not follow the international trade laws himself.
E.g. Facing sanctions from the WTO, the Bush administration quickly back-pedaled, and reversed the steel tariff regime." The Bush administration has decided to repeal most of its 20-month-old tariffs on imported steel to head off a trade war that would have included foreign retaliation against products exported from politically crucial states." - Washington Post (12/1/03) (http://www.perrspectives.com/features/Bush10Flips.htm).
b. Manufacturing who buy steel
c. Perhaps the overall economy of U.S. - The sanctions by WTO could have harmed the economy; however, Bush lifted the tariffs before this happened; is considering other measures to protect the American steel industry, however (http://www.mre.gov.py/paginas/boletines/omc/anteriores/boletin41220031.asp).
d. International steel industry e.g., Japan.
2. What are the implications (future and present)?
White House advisors concluded the tariffs were causing more harm than ...
This solution evaluates why President Bush imposed a tariff on foreign steel during his first mandate, and who benefited and/or who hurt. It also discusses the future and present implications.
Tariff's and quota's for U.S. steel
How does a tariff imposed by the U.S. government on foreign-made steel impact the
domestic price of U.S.-made steel?
Who gains and who loses from a tariff?
How will a quota imposed by the U.S. government on foreign-made machinery impact
the domestic price of the same kind of machinery made by U.S. companies?
Who gains and who loses from a quota?
"We need all kinds of trade restrictions against foreign competition to protect American
jobs!" Explain why this argument is seriously flawed.