Purchase Solution

Donald Platten convicted of Securities and Tax fraud

Not what you're looking for?

Ask Custom Question

Critique the attached document:

Is it clearly written? Does it give the reader ideas for further research? Does it add to your knowledge?

Department of Justice
Office of Public Affairs
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Friday, August 21, 2009
Boca Raton Man Convicted of Securities Fraud, Tax Fraud

WASHINGTON - Donald Platten of Boca Raton, Fla., was convicted today of conspiracy, securities fraud and tax charges following a jury trial before Judge Donald Middlebrooks in West Palm Beach, Fla., the Justice Department and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) announced.

In December 2008, Platten was indicted on 17 charges, including conspiracy to commit securities fraud, securities fraud, and conspiracy to commit wire fraud and impeding the internal revenue laws. He was convicted on the conspiracy to commit securities fraud count, 6 of the 14 securities fraud counts, conspiracy to commit wire fraud and impeding the internal revenue laws.

According to the indictment and evidence introduced at trial, Platten was the president of Harvard Learning Centers Inc., a Florida corporation also located in Boca Raton. Harvard Learning changed its name several times and claimed to be involved in several different business ventures. From 2004 to 2007, Platten caused Harvard Learning to issue stock to his wife, his sister, his ex-sister-in-law and his limousine driver, supposedly as repayment of promissory notes, even though Platten knew that the promissory notes were fraudulent and the company did not owe these individuals the money reflected on the promissory notes. In this manner, Platten caused Harvard Learning to issue stock to repay his own obligations and to enrich himself, his relatives and others. Platten also caused a subsidiary of Harvard Learning to pay the personal expenses of himself, his wife, his mother, his sister and his teenage son.

According to the indictment and evidence introduced at trial, Platten failed to file corporate federal tax returns for Harvard Learning for the years 2004 through 2007 and failed to file his personal federal tax returns for the years 2004 and 2005. For the year 2006, Platten failed to report on his personal tax return the income that he received as a result of Harvard Learning's stock issuances and payment of his personal expenses.

According to the indictment and evidence introduced at trial, Platten caused his limousine driver to purchase the house and obtain a mortgage by providing false information about his income and assets in order to conceal Platten's ownership of a house in Boca Raton. The day after he purchased the house, Platten caused his limousine driver to execute a quit claim deed transferring his interest in the property to Platten's wife.

Judge Middlebrooks scheduled sentencing for Oct. 30, 2009, at 10:30 a.m. Platten faces a maximum sentence of 133 years in prison and a maximum fine of $30.75 million.

John A. DiCicco, Acting Assistant Attorney General of the Justice Department's Tax Division, commended the IRS Criminal Investigation and the Food and Drug Administration Office of Criminal Investigations agents who investigated the case as well, Tax Division Trial Attorneys Steven D. Grimberg, Gregory R. Bockin and Kenneth C. Vert, who prosecuted the case. Acting Assistant Attorney General DiCicco also thanked the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida for their assistance in successfully prosecuting this matter.

Purchase this Solution

Solution Summary

Donald Platten convicted of securities and tax fraud is examined.

Solution Preview

See attached response.

Q: Critique it (is it clearly written? Does it give the reader ideas for further research? Does it add to your knowledge? Pages 2-4 (minimum 500 words)
Response:
This paper is extremely poorly written; there are not only duplicate words, but grammatical errors throughout this report and run-on sentences galore. The font does not match and there are "hyperlinks" included.
Let's work paragraph by paragraph.
WASHINGTON - Donald Platten of Boca Raton, Fla., was convicted today of conspiracy, securities fraud and tax charges following a jury trial before Judge Donald Middlebrooks in West Palm Beach, Fla., the Justice Department and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) announced.
1. I know that the IRS and DOJ reside in DC, but everyone may not know that. They may conclude this is a report from Washington State. Therefore, instead of saying Washington, it should read Washington, DC.
2. Florida is not abbreviated as Fla., if abbreviated at all; it should read "FL". This happens two times in the first paragraph.
3. The DOJ is not stated as the Justice Department when referencing it in this case. Here it should read Department of Justice (DOJ).
4. Yes, it does give the reader further ideas for research such as: Why was the trial held in West Palm Beach if the defendant resides in Boca Raton? Was this corporate fraud and the company resided in Boca Raton?
In December 2008, Platten was indicted on 17 charges, including conspiracy to commit securities fraud, securities fraud, conspiracy to commit wire fraud and impeding the internal revenue laws. He was convicted on the conspiracy to commit securities fraud count, 6 of the 14 securities fraud counts, conspiracy to commit wire fraud and impeding the internal revenue laws.
This paragraph is a mess. Not only is it extremely hard to follow and comprehend, it just does not even make sense.
1. The report states "FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE" and is dated August 21, 2009. However the date in this paragraph states December 2008. Is the date correct, or a misprint?
2. The words "was indicted" are appearing as a "hyperlink".
3. The paragraph states he was indicted on 17 charges - yet further down ...

Purchase this Solution


Free BrainMass Quizzes
MS Word 2010-Tricky Features

These questions are based on features of the previous word versions that were easy to figure out, but now seem more hidden to me.

Understanding Management

This quiz will help you understand the dimensions of employee diversity as well as how to manage a culturally diverse workforce.

Situational Leadership

This quiz will help you better understand Situational Leadership and its theories.

Academic Reading and Writing: Critical Thinking

Importance of Critical Thinking

Business Ethics Awareness Strategy

This quiz is designed to assess your current ability for determining the characteristics of ethical behavior. It is essential that leaders, managers, and employees are able to distinguish between positive and negative ethical behavior. The quicker you assess a person's ethical tendency, the awareness empowers you to develop a strategy on how to interact with them.