Explore BrainMass

Explore BrainMass


    This content was COPIED from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

    In 2008, the Board of Directors and shareholders of Anheuser Busch agreed to allow the company to be acquired by a Belgian Brewer (InBev). Prior to the merger, InBev made many pledges to AB regarding how the company would operate after the merger, how its employees would be treated, and so on.
    Since the merger, InBev has begun to layoff a significant number of Anheuser Busch employees, most of whom worked at the St. Louis headquarters. Where the merger created duplication of job duties, those being terminated have to-date been from AB, not InBev. There is a great deal of speculation and trepidation around the St. Louis area about the fate of the remaining employees, as well as worry about how the new company will view the many and varied civic contributions the company has made to St. Louis and the many other U.S. areas in which it has operations.
    View 1 - AB acted as a well-managed business that takes the actions necessary to remain competitive in a very competitive market. If AB had not approved the merger, its profits and stock price would have fallen, and investment capital would have fled the company. As difficult as the decision was, AB operates in a very competitive environment and owes its stockholders the best return it can provide.
    View 2 - The decision to sell the company was both short-sighted and, ultimately, a bad business decision. Any short term benefits AB stockholders reaped from the merger will be more than offset by U.S. job losses, lower tax revenues for States and the U.S. Government, and damage to the U.S. communities in which the company operates. Employees whose employers are loyal to them during difficult times repay that loyalty to the company through hard work. Employees who view themselves as economic pawns to be added or discarded as needed will feel only a marginal commitment to the new AB and their work performance will reflect the negative opinion they hold of their employer.
    Let's hear your thoughts.

    © BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com December 15, 2020, 6:42 pm ad1c9bdddf

    Solution Preview

    The harsh reality is that an organization's goal is to maximize its shareholder's wealth and profits (Robbins and Judge, 2007). Unfortunately in some circumstances this brings about many tough decisions that can be both ethical and legal in nature. In this scenario, Anheuser-Busch made the right decision by combining its business with the Belgian Brewer (InBev). Although the circumstances that surround the situation are very unfortunate, it would be hard to justify to shareholders not merging the companies. Although many may believe this decision was short-sighted it created the best economical benefit to its ...

    Solution Summary

    This detailed solution discussing the situation between foreign company InBev and Anheuser Busch employees.