Explore BrainMass

Explore BrainMass

    Richard, Chester and Bernice: the lottery ticket winning

    Not what you're looking for? Search our solutions OR ask your own Custom question.

    This content was COPIED from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

    Legal Application Case Study

    Richard was friends with Chester and Bernice. All three were residents of Indiana. Bernice, who was employed in an Illinois tavern where Illinois state lottery tickets were sold, had previously obtained lottery tickets for Richard because Indiana did not have a state lottery. In early April 1984, Richard requested that Chester and Bernice purchase an Illinois lottery ticket for him. He gave Chester and Bernice the money for the ticket and the numbers 6-15-16-23-24-37. Chester and Bernice purchased the ticket, but when it turned out to be the winning combination worth $1,696,800. They refused to give the ticket to Richard and unsuccessfully tried to collect the money. Richard filed suit against Chester and Bernice in Indiana, claiming the ticket and proceeds thereof. Was the contract legal? Why or Why not? Did the Chester and Bernice act ethically in this case? Should Chester and Bernice be able to keep the winnings from the lottery ticket? Why or Why not?

    © BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com December 15, 2022, 7:27 pm ad1c9bdddf

    Solution Preview

    The response addresses the queries posted in 228 Words, APA References

    Oral Contract & Lottery Ticket

    The Contract between Richard and Chester & Bernice was valid. An Oral Contract is valid as a Written Contract and one of the Parties involved in the contract can file a complaint against another party in case of Breach of Contract (Stroh & Johnson, 2006). The contract in ...

    Solution Summary

    The expert examines the lottery ticket winners. The response addresses the queries posted in 228 Words, APA References.