Explore BrainMass

Documenting Audit Findings in the Junior Auditor case

This content was STOLEN from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

Most major accounting firms rely on three main revenue streams:
Auditing services, Tax services & Business consulting.

Since the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires publicly traded companies to be audited by an external CPA firm, auditing can be a significant part of most accounting firms' revenue.

Review the Documenting Audit Findings scenario below.

Respond to the following questions:
What would you do if you were the junior auditor?
Should the auditor's notes be rewritten?

Documenting Audit Findings Scenario:
Audits are typically performed by a team of auditors led by one of the accounting firm's partners. The team keeps detailed notes during the process to document their findings. In this situation, the audit team was reviewing a business where a former corporate executive recently left the company under suspicion and controversy. During the audit, one of the auditors noticed that several key accounting records and files were missing. The junior auditor documented the observation in her notes and mentioned that such a discrepancy could be a sign of someone trying to cover-up embezzlement. The senior partner managing the audit strongly reprimanded the junior auditor for suggesting embezzlement in her report and ordered her to delete the reference.

© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 25, 2018, 1:29 am ad1c9bdddf

Solution Preview

This is a very interesting scenario and is certainly the type of event which happens in the real world.

There are a variety of issues in this problem and following are ideas, in no particular order of events:

1. The junior auditor was correct in documenting the missing files, but the next part about embezzlement was not documentation, but a supposition based on no known facts. In that regard, part of the note should be removed.

2. The junior auditor should have reported verbally to the audit manager or partner in charge about his/her suppositions.

3. Remember that there is no client privilege for audit firms when it comes to litigation. The files can be discovered and subpoenaed as part of a lawsuit. If opposing counsel read ...

Solution Summary

The 504 word solution presents nine issues in response to the junior auditor notes and subsequent reprimand. The nine issues explain the importance and possible consequences of the workpapers notes. Then there are two short paragraphs in response to the questions.

See Also This Related BrainMass Solution

How the Sarbanes Oxley Act Changed the Audit Environment

Can you please help me with the following questions:

a. Identify how the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 changed the audit environment for auditors.
b. Identify and explain new liabilities for managements of public companies created by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
c. Identify five other ways in which the Private Securities Reform Act of 1995 will potentially change auditors' legal liability. Explain how each is of potential benefit to the auditor.

View Full Posting Details