Please see the two attachments - one outlines the questions and the other is the case study (Beta Management Company).
1. Compute the standard deviation of the stock returns of California REIT and Brown Group during the past 2 years.
2. Suppose that Beta's position had been 99% of equity funds invested in the index fund, and 1% in the individual stock. Calculated the standard deviation of this portfolio using each stock. How does each stock affect the variability of the equity investment?
3. Based on your answers to questions 1 and 2, which stock is riskiest?
4. Regress each stock's monthly returns on the Index returns to compute the "beta" for each stock. Relate your answer to question 3.
5. What do you think about the move to a more active stock-picking strategy?
Beta Management Company
In early January 1991, Sarah Wolfe was in her office considering new goals and directions for her company forth coming year. Ms. Wolfe was the founder and CEO fo the Beta Management Group, a small investment management company based in a Boston suburb. She dealt with a growing number of high-net-worth individual clients and had $25 million in assets under management. Beta's investment success during the past year had brought in a steady stream of new clients and additional money from existing clients. At the same time, Ms. Wolfe had inquiries from some small institutions, and was hoping to expand her business in 1991.
Beta Management Company was founded in 1988. A wealthy couple had become fed up with their investment losses stemming from the October 1987 crash and had asked their friend, Ms. Wolfe, to manage a portion of their money. While business was slow at first, she gradually developed a client base through good performance and word of mouth. She considered herself a market strategist, and Beta Management's stated goals were to enhance returns but reduce risks for clients via market timing. Given the small size of her accounts, the easiest way for her to maintain and adjust equity market exposure was to "index". She would keep a majority of Beta's funds in no-load, low-expense index funds (with the remainder in money market instruments), adjusting the level of market exposure between 50% and 99% of Beta's funds in an attempt to "time the market." She had toyed with using a few different index funds at first, but soon settled on exclusive use of Vanguard's Index 500 Trust due to its extremely low expense ratio and its success at closely matching the return on the S&P 500 Index.
While Beta's performance had lagged market returns in 1989, Ms. Wolfe had been quite successful in 1990. She had reduced Beta's equity position to 50% in June, partially missing a large two-month market decline (see Table 1). After nervously waiting out August and September, she began moving money back into the index fund. The report in front of her showed that as of January 4, 1991, Beta Management had 79.2% of its $25 million invested in the Vanguard fund; Beta had also made money for its clients during a down market year.
This success had brought in enough new money to double the size of Beta in under six months, allowing Ms. Wolfe to finally make the move to work full-time managing money. But she had lost some potential new clients who had thought it unusual that Beta Management used only an index mutual fund and picked none of its own stocks. Ms. Wolfe had felt this same resistance in conversations with a few of the potential institutional clients she was courting. As a result, one of her New Year's resolutions had been to begin looking at some individual stocks for possible purchase for Beta's equity portfolio. She would focus on smaller stocks, since she didn't want to compete with Beta's equity portfolio. She would focus on smaller stocks, since she didn't want to compete with larger, analyst-staffed funds on their own turf, and also because she already had exposure to the S&P 500 stocks through investment in the index fund. She also decided to increase the proportion of Beta's assets in equities, since she felt the market was still a good value and that 1991 would be a good year.
As a first step toward both of these goals, Ms. Wolfe was considering immediately increasing her equity exposure to 80% with the purchase of one of two stocks recommended by her newly hired analyst. Both were small NYSE-listed companies whose stock price had eroded over the past two years (see Table 1) to levels that seemed unreasonably low.
California R.E.I.T. was a real estate investment trust that made equity and mortgage investments in income-producing properties (retail building 57%; industrial 17%; offices 15%; apartments 11%) in Arizona (51%), California (30%), and Washington (19%). Its investments and stock price had been badly damaged by the "World Series" earthquake of 1989 and the downturn in California real estate values (see Table 1). Ms. Wolfe viewed it as a good value, but noticed that it was an extremely volatile stock. Its stock price closed at $2 ¼ per share on January 4, 1991.
Brown Group, Inc was one of the largest manufacturers and retailers of branded footwear, and had been undergoing a major restructuring program since 1989. Earnings dropped in 1989 but had stayed positive and steady; the stock price had dropped substantially in late 1989 and late 1990. Ms. Wolfe knew that some of Brown's many brand names - including Jordache, Naturalizer, and Buster Brown - would wear well during the current recession, and she like the steady cash flow and earnings. She noted, though, that Brown's stock price seemed quite variable and somewhat sensitive to movements in the stock market. Still, she felt it was an attractive opportunity at its January 4 price of $24.
Ms. Wolfe felt that now was the right time to begin her program of adding individual stock investments and increasing her equity position. A $200,000 purchase of one of these stocks would increase her total equity exposure to $20 million. Still, she had some doubts. She was quite worried about he variability in individual stocks in general, and these stocks in particular. After all, she had always promised her clients reasonable returns with a focus on keeping their exposure to risk under control. She noticed that these stocks both seemed to bounce around in price much more than the market (or the index fund), and she wondered if she was doing the right thing exposing her clients to these new risks.
Investment Return Data
Month Vanguard Index 500 Trust California R.E.I.T. Brown Group
1989 - January 7.32 -28.26 9.16
February -2.47 -3.03 0.73
March 2.26 8.75 -0.29
April 5.18 -1.47 2.21
May 4.04 -1.49 -1.08
June -0.59 -9.09 -0.65
July 9.01 10.67 2.22
August 1.86 -9.38 0
September -0.4 10.34 1.88
October -2.34 -14.38 -7.55
November 2.04 -14.81 -12.84
December 2.38 -4.35 -1.7
1990 - January -6.72 -5.45 -15.21
February 1.27 5 7.61
March 2.61 9.52 1.11
April -2.5 -0.87 -0.51
May 9.69 0 12.71
June -0.69 4.55 3.32
July -0.32 3.48 3.17
August -9.03 0 -14.72
September -4.89 -13.04 -1.91
October -0.41 0 -12.5
November 6.44 1.5 17.26
December 2.72 -2.56 -8.53
Answers to questions on Case Study on Capital Asset Pricing Model: Beta Management Company. It computes the standard deviation of the stock returns of California REIT and Brown Group during the past 2 years . It calculates beta of each stock and answers questions on which stock is riskiest etc.
Dividend Growth, CAPM or APT
I need help with writing a report explaining the challenge of estimating or coming with a good "feel" for the "cost of equity capital" or the rate of return that you feel your company investors require as the minimum rate of return that they expect of require my company (General Mills) to earn on their investment in the shares of the company. There are several asset pricing models used to estimate the cost of equity capital for this module in the background materials. After reading through the background materials, write a 5 to 6 pages report for the board of directors for General Mills by responding to the following tasks:
Which of the three models (dividend growth, CAPM, or APT) is the best one for estimating the required rate of return (or discount rate) of General Mills company? Based on your analysis and findings, what would you recommend to the board of directors of your SLP company?
In your paper, include discussion of the following issues:
1. Ease of use of these three models
2. Accuracy of each of these three models
3. How realistic the assumptions of each model are
For this paper I need to take a clear stand and pick one of these three models to defend to the Board of Directors. You cannot tell the Board of Directors that "I like all three models," they want you to come to them with a decisive choice of just one model.
The cost of equity (discount rate) can also be determined by using the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM). Calculating the cost of equity using CAPM model is often more difficult than using the dividend discount model. The companies' financial statements do not show the cost of equity.
The following table shows necessary (hypothetical) information to calculate the cost of equity by using CAPM model:
Company Listing RRF RM Ã?j
Nike Inc. NYSE: NKE 0.20% 4.49% 0.79
Sony Corporation NYSE: SNE 0.20% 6.83% 1.98
McDonald's Corporation NYSE: MCD 0.20% 2.94% 0.29
E(rj )= RRF + b(RM - RRF)
E(rj ) - The cost of equity
RRF - Risk free rate of return)
Ã?j - Beta of the security
RM - Return on market portfolio)
Based on the above information, which company has higher cost of equity? Why? Please explain your reasoning in brief.View Full Posting Details