Explore BrainMass
Share

adverse selection and moral hazard

This content was STOLEN from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

I need an answer to the following question: Is there anything the U.S. government can do today to improve the nation's competitive position in the global economy?

© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 24, 2018, 7:28 pm ad1c9bdddf
https://brainmass.com/economics/international-financial-crisis/68960

Solution Preview

State is an indispensable instrument of economic development and it take undertake activities that would compensate for the market failure. Market failure is perceived as the inability of markets to allocate optimally resources over time.
The role of the government may include:
A) Determination of the conditions under which individuals or groups would be permitted to enter certain lines of business or avail of public facilities and scarce resources.
B) Regulating the conduct of Industrial or business through legislation such as telecom regulatory authority in India has laid down fair rules for the industry.
C) Regulating the relationship between different segments or interest groups in the economy so as to protect legal rights.
D) By providing an analytical framework for the industries, private sector, externalities such as pollution ...

Solution Summary

Examine the effects and implications of adverse selection and moral hazard.

$2.19
See Also This Related BrainMass Solution

Adverse Selection, Moral Hazard, and Finance

I've stated below the questions I'm having some difficulty with as well as my thoughts on the answer.

1) Households make four kinds of economic decisions (textbook, pp. 4-5). Suppose you have two households with the same income. Household A has one income earner and Household B has two income earners.
How would the four types of economic decisions differ between these two otherwise identical households?
(My thoughts: I think that the main difference between the two is that the one with two income earners can take more risks in all of the decisions.)

2) Adam Smith is often called the father of economics. His famous book, The Wealth of Nations, talks about an "invisible hand," which automatically allocates goods to the persons most able to put them to good use. The invisible hand operates through the price mechanism for goods and services, so that individuals who trade on the market, while seeking only their own goods, are actually efficiently allocating society's resources. His ideas, if applied to modern capital markets, imply that these markets would efficiently allocate investment capital to the firms that would use the capital most efficiently in producing goods and services for society. Yet, this would happen only if markets were left to operate without state intervention. Do you think modern governments should leave capital markets unregulated? Why or why not?

3) In each of the following situations, moral hazard or adverse selection may be present. Indicate which you think is present, if any, and explain your choice.
-An insurance company is thinking about issuing health insurance to a firm's employees. (My thoughts: Moral)
-An insurance company has issued health insurance to a firm's employees on the basis of their medical histories. (My thoughts: Adverse)
-An investor is asking for a bank loan to support a new business she wants to operate. She is unwilling to submit to a credit check. (My thoughts: Adverse)
-An investor has purchased shares in a new software company. He is just a shareholder, and is not going to be involved in the daily operations of the firm. (My thoughts: None)
-A grandfather has just given his grandson $100 as a birthday present. (My thoughts: None)

In each of the situations considered in question 2 and 3, what could be done to overcome the problem? (My thoughts: I'm not too sure, since I'm not 100% sure on the differences between the two)

4) Imagine a corporation with $1,000,000 of assets and a debt ratio of 40%. Return on equity (ROE) is expected to be 20% for the foreseeable future. Assume the firm keeps the same amount of debt indefinitely (as opposed to keeping the same debt ratio).
-What do you expect the firm's earnings to be for the next 3 years if the firm doesn't pay out any dividends or re-purchase any shares? (My thoughts: 1st - 600,000 x 20% = $120,000; 2nd - 720,000 x 20%= $144,000; 3rd - 864,000 x 20%= $172,800)
-If the firm doesn't pay any dividends or re-purchase any shares, at what rate would the firm grow from year to year? (My thoughts: 20%)
-If the firm pays 50% of its earnings as dividends, at what rate would the firm grow from year to year? (My thoughts: 10% (50% of 20%))
-If the firm uses 80% of its earnings to re-purchase shares from its shareholders, at what rate would the firm grow from year to year? (My thoughts: 4% (80% of %20=16%; 20-16=4))
-If the firm pays 50% of its earnings as dividends, and uses an additional 20% of its earnings to re-purchase shares from its shareholders, at what rate would the firm grow from year to year? (My thoughts: 6% (70% of 20%=14%, 20-14=6))
-What does the term "Sustainable Growth Rate" mean? Would the amounts you have calculated in parts b. to d. equal the Sustainable Growth Rate for the firm? (My thoughts: I don't have a clue)

View Full Posting Details