In this problem, assume that Mexico and the United States have the same aggregate production function, the same δ (value for depreciation of capital stock), and the same n . In Mexico, real GDP per worker in 2000 is about 40% what it is in the United States, but Mexico is not near its steady-state level of output.

1. If the capital-labor ratio is the same in both countries, how much capital per worker does Mexico have in 2000?

2. If the capital-labor ratio is the same in both countries, what does this model predict will be the real interest rate in Mexico?

3. Why it is not plausible to assume that Mexico and the United States have the same aggregate production function and that the capital labor ratio is the same both countries?

4. Actually, Mexico only has 40% as much capital per worker as the United States has. What does this fact imply about total factor productivity in Mexico? What about the real interest rate in Mexico?

... There is no government. What are the steady-state values of capital per worker, output per worker, consumption per worker, and investment per worker? ...

... b. If the savings rate is 0.2 and the depreciation rate is 0.05, calculate the steady-state capital stock per worker, output per worker, and consumption per ...

... 5√k, where k = K/L is the capital per worker Y/L = 5√k (a) The steady state capital per worker is given by k = (5s/d)^2 = (5 * 0.1/0.1)^2 = 25 Thus steady...

...state output per unit of capital. If the professor wants capital/output then you will invert it and get (s/delta). To find out the value of output per worker...

... s*y) becomes a function of capital per worker (i = s ... we develop the following (change in capital) formula, ∆k ... us, ∆k = s*f(k) - δk Steady State Equilibrium. ...

... number of effective workers at rate g, growth of technology, which would cause capital per effective worker to fall at rate g. At the steady state, output per ...

... to the economy suddenly destroys 75% of its capital stock. ... ii) How long before output per worker returns to within 10% of its steady-state growth path level ...

... total productivity is increasing at a rate of 2% per year, then however in the steady state, output per worker is growing at rate gn as is capital per worker. ...

... the same amount of investment (saving), saving per worker decreases, and therefore the steady state shifts down from A to B. Capital per worker has decreased ...