# Payoff Matrix - Nash Equilibria

I do not understand this problem. Can you please help me?

In the following payoff matrix, Player A announces that she will cooperate.

Player B

Defect Cooperate

A: -1 A: 0.5

B:2 B:1

Cooperate

Player A

A:0 A:1

Defect B:0.5 B: -1

a. How is this likely to change the outcome?

b. What does your answer to a suggest about the value of cheap talk?

c. How could Player A maker her pronouncement believable?

© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 25, 2018, 3:14 am ad1c9bdddfhttps://brainmass.com/economics/game-theory/payoff-matrix-nash-equilibria-332038

#### Solution Preview

Hello,

I hope you are doing well. Please see my response below. I have done my best to answer your question to the best of my ability. I hope you find the response excellent. Thanks and good luck.

a. B's dominant strategy is to Defect as the payout for that is more than the payout for the respective payouts to Cooperate. A's dominant strategy is to defect as well as ...

Answers to three common Microeconomics review questions. The topics covered are:

1. Payoff Matrix and Dominant Strategy

2. Nash Equilibrium

3. Pricing Decisions

Question 5

The figure shows the payoff matrix for two producers of bottled water, Blue Spring and Purple Rain. Each has two strategies available to it: a high price and a low price. The dominant strategy for Purple Rain is to ...

a) always charge a low price.

b) always charge a high price.

c) always adopt the same strategy as Blue Spring.

d) Purple Rain does not have a dominant strategy.

Question 6

The figure shows the payoff matrix for two producers of bottled water, Blue Spring and Purple Rain. Each has two strategies available to it: a high price and a low price. Which outcomes are Nash equilibrium(s) in this game?

Answer

a) Blue Spring : low and Purple Rain : high

b) Two Nash equilibriums:

1. Blue Spring : low and Purple Rain : high; and

2. Blue Spring : high and Purple Rain : low

c) there are none here

d) every outcome is a Nash equilibrium in this game

Question 7

Your friend Iskander owns a coffee shop in a town with many competing coffee shops in a monopolistically competitive industry. One day Iskander tells you (a trusted economic advisor) that he is earning an economic profit and is currently setting his price equal to his marginal cost. Is Iskander producing the profit-maximizing amount of coffee? What should he do?

See the attached file for the diagrams.

View Full Posting Details