A government wants to institute a hybrid car rebate of $3000 per car for hybrids that average $25,000 in price and get 45 mpg. Consumers are currently purchasing 750,000 of these hybrids annually. The demand elasticity of hybrid cars is 1.2. How much does it cost the government for every metric ton of carbon not emitted into the atmosphere over the life of the car as a result of the rebate program, if it goes into effect and runs for one year? Assume the average car owner drives 12,000 miles per year, and the average life of both types of car is 15 years. Those who don't buy hybrids purchase cars that average 30 mpg. In order to do a full "life cycle analysis" of the program what other factors would you need to consider?
How would I use a supply-demand curve to solve the problem? What factors would you need to undertake a full "life cycle analysis" of the government rebate program for hybrid cars?© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 25, 2018, 6:34 am ad1c9bdddf
First, let's organize what we are given in point form:
-demand for hybrid = 750,000
-elasticity for hybrid = 1.2
-price for hybrid = 25,000
-rebate = 3,000
-hybrid = 45 mpg, normal cars = 30 mpg
-12,000 miles/year for 15 years.
The government gives a 3,000 rebate, or a 3000/25000 = 12% rebate. The elasticity tells us that if price reduces by 12%, demand will increase by 12% X 1.2 = 14.4%. After the rebate program, the new demand would be 750000 X 114.4% = 858,000. The government gives 3,000 to each car purchaser, thus the total spending on the gov't side is 2,574,000,000
Since each owner drives 12,000 for 15 years, ...
Demand elasticity for CO2 abatement and life cycle analysis
Multiple Choice Review Questions
See attached file for full assignment.
1. in the late 1990's mad cow disease caused people to buy less beef. It also caused the eu to ban imported bristish beef and the bristish government to ban the sale of older cattle. What is the effect of the following on price and quantity of British beef sold worldwide?
2. A quantity restriction of QR will:
3. Refer to graphs. The consequences of improved technology combined with an increased in the
number of consumers
4. USA today noted that the destruction caused by three 2004 hurricanes combined with the already high real estate prices were making people reconsider retiring to Florida. The cost of homeownership was increasing partly because past hurricanes had roughly doubled insurance premiums statewide. Construction costs could rise due to stricter building codes. Some people however did not expect the influx of retirees to change because the baby boom generation was approaching retirement age and Florida had long attracted many retirees. Which factor would not move either the supply or demand curve.
9. In 2004 Taiwan news online reports that demand for healthy kidneys is high in both India and Nepal. But it is also illegal to buy or sell organs. Despite the legal and social disapproval, there is an illegal market for organs. Assuming the legal and social disapproval does not influence sellers but discourages buyers from seeking organs, the disapproval will:View Full Posting Details