Explore BrainMass

Capital Budgeting: NPV, PI, IRR, Payback

This content was STOLEN from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

How do the capital budgeting systems of NPV, PI, IRR, and Payback compare with each other? How is each employed in capital budgeting decisions?

© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 25, 2018, 8:58 am ad1c9bdddf

Solution Preview

Strengths and weaknesses

Payback differs from NPV, PI and IRR because it does not consider the time value of money. In fact, it only looks to see how quickly the investment is repaid by returns. This is a very conservative approach and so limits risk. Its weakness is that it disregards the cost of capital (time value of money).

NPV and PI analyze the present value of future cash flows and returns either a dollar amount (NPV) or a ratio (PI) giving a clear decision result (positive $ or over 1 for PI). This is easy to absorb and translates into cash flow that is the major outcome desired. It uses time value to discount flows that are far off and so advantages near returns. It is hard to compute so you need a spreadsheet and not everyone understands all the ingredients.

IRR is an annualized rate of return that can be quickly compared to ...

Solution Summary

Your discussion is 615 words and two references.

See Also This Related BrainMass Solution

Capital Budgeting Techniques: NPV, PI, IRR, MIRR, and Payback.

Using the CSU Online Library and the unit reading assignment, explore the capital budgeting techniques covered in the unit, NPV, PI, IRR, and Payback. Compare and contrast each of the techniques with an emphasis on comparative strengths and weaknesses. Be sure to show you understand how each is applied and used in capital budgeting decisions.

View Full Posting Details