Explore BrainMass

Explore BrainMass

    Origin & Evolution

    Origins of the Universe

    Today, the presiding theories for the origin of the universe are the varying religious ones and the Big Bang Theory. There are a few philosophical distinctions to be made among those who take a religious view of the creation of the universe. Firstly, it is important to acknowledge that not all religious thinkers interpreted their sacred texts literally; for example, a Christian may be a creationist and believe the world was created in 6 days, or they may be a theistic evolutionist who takes the story as metaphor and reconciles scientific findings with their faith (e.g. evolution is true, but only because of God's intent). Secondly, in monotheistic religions, there are differences between the attitude that their god is constantly intervening to exert their will, and the deist idea that the creation was so perfect it needs no more tending. The latter looks to the analogy of a human watchmaker for philosophical backing, reasoning that a good watchmaker need not continue to go in and tinker with the watch once it is completed. However, the context of this analogy is the environment of Earth that allows a watch to run unattended so it is fallacious to drawn comparison between these conditions and the environment of the whole of cosmic existence1.

    The Big Bang Theory, proposed by the Belgian priest and professor of physics Georges Lemaitre and widely attributed to Edwin Hubble, provoked much philosophical controversy at its genesis. Although Lemaitre's calculations are a correct use of Einstein's theory of relativity, not even Einstein himself wished to accept the idea of an expanding universe, and went so far as to construct the 'cosmological constant' which would prevent this (though he later called this weakness of scientific objectivity his 'greatest blunder'2). There were multiple religious objections concerning the proposed age of the universe and the creatorless nature of the theory, and also much philosophical interest in the implications of an expanding universe for the beginning and end of time. While other theories, such as the steady-state ones, do exist, the Big Bang has the most evidence and is therefore the current scientific explanation, regardless of philosophically-motivated objections.

    Origins of Life

    Cultures everywhere have looked to gods and religions when pondering the origins of life. It was not until the 6th century B.C. that Thales, a sage of early Greek society, attempted to disentangle theology and science3. He proposed that life originated from water, due to its abundance and the dependency on it shared by all living things. Later, his students' students and their contemporaries would argue that others of the four 'humours' - primarily air or fire - were responsible for giving life, but Thales' first student, Anaximander had a different idea. He considered the prolonged weakness of human young as compared to that of animals and rationalised that in order to survive, we must have once been hatched fully-formed and capable of defending ourselves, from much better-defended parents3. These thorny-shelled parents were hypothesised to have originated from wet slime and sun when acted upon by a mysterious force he named 'apherion' and while this does not reflect current scientific thinking, it does provide a first, tentative step toward a theory of evolution wherein species are not immutable.

    From this idea, expanded upon by others after Anaximander, Aristotle put forth the notion of spontaneous generation. He reasoned that while some animals were born of reproduction as we understand it today, others, mostly insects, were able to come forth parentless from things like snow, putrefying meat and fire4. Considering how maggots appear to grow from nothing out of rotting meat, it is understandable that someone lacking our scientific knowledge and instruments would come to this conclusion, but it was not until the 16th century, with the emergence of microbiology pioneered by Hooke and van Leeuwenhoek, that the theory began to be discredited. However, the study of modern abiogenesis as an origin of early fundamental organisms, among other theories (such as an RNA world, deep sea cradles and even panspermia, continues.

    Theory of Evolution

    Origins aside, the main scientific theory of the progress of life has also drawn much philosophical interest. We have seen that Darwin was not the first to hypothesise species transformation, but he did so in a decidedly different way. It is true that even Aristotle's worldview of ancient times allowed for change in individuals, though it required the souls and general 'world order' of plants, animals and humans to endure eternally5, yet the scientific element was not there. Darwin mixed philosophical ideas with scientific observations to reach his world-changing conclusions. Although the theory of evolution is widely accepted by the scientific community in modern times, it is not problem-free. For example, there is debate over whether something unfalsifiable which makes no predictions can be called science at all, and drawing distinctions between species on their way through evolution can seem arbitrary. There are also a plethora of philosophical investigations ongoing into whether evolution then has a 'goal', what the lack of larger purpose means for an individual's sense of purpose, and whether humanity should take a moral stand against the 'survival of the fittest' mechanism that drives natural selection.

    Darwin's first sketch of an evolutionary tree preceeded by the words "I think".

     

    References:

    1. Jonathan Kvanvig (2008). Creation and Conservation. [ONLINE] Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/creation-conservation/#SciTheCre. [Last Accessed 24/2/14].

    2. Ethan (2013). “Einstein’s Greatest Blunder” was REALLY a blunder!. [ONLINE] Available at: http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/2013/05/17/einsteins-greatest-blunder-was-really-a-blunder/. [Last Accessed 24/2/14].

    3. Joyce Puglia (2014). The Origin of Life:A History of Ancient Greek Theories. [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.yale.edu/ynhti/curriculum/units/1980/5/80.05.11.x.html. [Last Accessed 24/2/14].

    4. Aristotle, (2005). 'Book V'. D’Arcy Wentworth Thompson (trans), The History of Animals. 2nd ed. Adelaide, Australia: eBooks@Adelaide. Available at: http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/a/aristotle/history/book5.html.

    5. Phillip Sloan (2010). Evolution. [ONLINE] Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/evolution/#1. [Last Accessed 24/2/14].

    The painting under the Origins of the Universe heading is Europe a Prophecy by William Blake.

    © BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com March 28, 2024, 3:42 pm ad1c9bdddf

    BrainMass Solutions Available for Instant Download

    Rationalizing the Existence of God and Religion

    Please help explain the following questions: i) Is proof for the existence of God necessary? ii) Which argument for the existence of God is strongest? Why? iii) What are the foundations of the universe and from where did the universe emerge? iv) Can one be moral and not believe in God? v) Are science and religion in c

    Fairytales & Religion (Origin of Names)

    Although it is true that primitive religions are bound to the host culture and cannot survive as a whole when exposed to other civilizations and religions, subtle glimpses of this type of culture can still be seen all over the world. Think about some of the fairy tales you heard growing up. What about some of the superstitious t

    Arguments for the existence of God

    Of the three questions below, select and answer at least two (whichever you like). 1) select one of the arguments for the existence of God and explain why you do or do not find it convincing. 2) Consider the lyrics from a song called "Heaven" by the group "Live" and explain what you think is being said about proof for God

    Air, water, fire, earth, numbers.......

    If you lived in the Greek world during the sixth century B.C.E. and knew only what could be done at that period, which of the basic substances or entities would you choose as the foundation of reality, based on your own observations? Why?

    Does it make a difference if there is a God or not?

    I have to do a 11-14 page power point on the above subject. Here are a few questions that I am trying to answer. What are the Philosophies Related to My Topic? What are the Misconceptions about My Topic? What are the reasons that people do Not believe in God? What are the reasons people do Believe in God? Any poss

    Are Creation and Evolution Mutually Exclusive Categories?

    The solution tackles the arguments and questions below: 1 Does evolution imply a creator? 2.Is natural selection something that should be worked against? 3.Is there a model of divinity that can survive into the 21st century? 4. Does the anthropic principle imply a designer? 5. Discuss which of the two - Albert Einstein or

    Is There a God?

    I am doing a PowerPoint presentation in which I have to describe my personal viewpoint on "Is There A God" as well as 3-4 related principle issues. I am having trouble coming up with an outline. I need help!

    Debating the Importance of Faith & God

    Please assist so that I can complete this assignment. Does it make a difference if there is or isn't a God? Cover a topic mentioned above, as well as 3-4 principle issues within your topic. Develop your personal philosophy concerning the topic you choose. Cite at least three philosophers mentioned in Philosophy: The Pow

    The Impact of Christianity Response

    Please help me so that I can complete: A response describing Christianity's impact on philosophy. Include the following topics in your response: o the rise of Christianity in philosophy o key contributors to Christianity's impact on philosophy o principle Christianized philosophical issues

    Impact of Christianity on Philosophy

    Resources: Ch.5 in Philosophy: The Power of Ideas (attached) Wtite a 350-700 word response describing Christianity's impact on philosophy. Include the following topics in your response: the rise of Christianity in philosophy key contributors to Christianity's impact on philosophy principle Christianized philosophical issues

    Is there a God?

    I am completing my presentation due next week and looking for assistance on the finalized version. Trying to prove my argument of existence. 1 slide that presents the topic and your central thesis (theme) Having a hard time with this o 3-4 slides that describe 3-4 principle philosophic issues (be specific and nam

    The historical development of religious philosophy

    Considering the historical development of religious philosophy, whose philosophies do you think most advanced Western religious thought? This is a general question, I have an idea, but need another opinion.

    Several arguments have been proposed to show that the belief in God is not an unreasonable option. Outline the two major arguments-cosmological and teleological-identifying their premises and their conclusions.

    3. Several arguments have been proposed to show that the belief in God is not an unreasonable option. Outline the two major arguments-cosmological and teleological-identifying their premises and their conclusions. Are these arguments convincing? What objections can be raised against their validity?

    Arguments for the Existence of God & Theism

    2. Theism offers a clear way to approach the relationship between faith and reason. This can be seen by considering some of the arguments for the existence of God by theists such as Saint Thomas Aquinas. Explain the idea of theism. Do you find theism to be an intellectually satisfactory solution to the issue concerning the meani

    Discussing the problem of God in the history of philosophy

    Some philosophers, like Kierkegaard, find it reasonable to believe in God in their philosophical enterprise while others do not. And each group makes a compelling argument to back the stance taken. For some God is just a an abstract idea that helps them to make their point while for others, God is being who is involved in the l