Purchase Solution

Proof of Dual

Not what you're looking for?

Ask Custom Question

Hello,

Could you please help me to prove this using Farkas Lemma?

Well, I initially thought that I can use Farkas Lemma, but if it is impossible to use the lemma (though I do belive it will help), you might try other way.

Thank you!

---
(See attached file for full problem description)

Attachments
Purchase this Solution
Solution Summary

This shows how to complete the proof of a Dual problem.

Solution Preview

Please see the attached file.

Suppose that , are such that , and
, are such that

Prove that there exists such that

Proof: Since , where , , ...

Purchase this Solution
Free BrainMass Quizzes
Solving quadratic inequalities

This quiz test you on how well you are familiar with solving quadratic inequalities.

Multiplying Complex Numbers

This is a short quiz to check your understanding of multiplication of complex numbers in rectangular form.

Exponential Expressions

In this quiz, you will have a chance to practice basic terminology of exponential expressions and how to evaluate them.

Graphs and Functions

This quiz helps you easily identify a function and test your understanding of ranges, domains , function inverses and transformations.

Know Your Linear Equations

Each question is a choice-summary multiple choice question that will present you with a linear equation and then make 4 statements about that equation. You must determine which of the 4 statements are true (if any) in regards to the equation.

View More Free Quizzes
Related BrainMass Solutions

  • Linear programming proof

    Therefore w= is also feasible to dual problem, that is , or , i.e., , hence . This is a proof of a given linear program involving the basis matrix.

  • Linear Programming : Proof using Duality and the Farkas Lemma

    and its dual max s.t. are feasible. Then at least one of them has an unbounded feasible region. Duality in Linear programming: Proof: Consider the primal max{cx / Ax  b} and its dual min{yTb/ y0,yTA = c}.

  • Duality and Saddle Points

    I would be grateful for a full proof of both the first and second parts of this theorem, in particular for the reciprocal. Please see the attached file for the complete solution. Thanks for using BrainMass.

  • Graphs : Coloring Maps

    Proof : Let G we any graph of 2 face colourable. Then dual graph of G., i.e. G* having chromatic number (G)= 2. Therefore G* is a bipartite graph. Note that every graph is bipartite if and only if it has chromatic number 2.

  • Riesz Representation Theorem and Hoelder's Inequality

    123174 Riesz Representation Theorem and Hoelder's Inequality On Problems 4 and 5 with 1dual to p, it will be helpful to remember from the proof of Young's inequality that, for y and z positive numbers, y^p = z^q if and

  • Bond percolation the square lattice

    A dual bond is put on an edge of the dual lattice if that edge crosses an edge of the original lattice that is not occupied by a bond. See Fig. ref{dual}. The probability that an edge of the dual lattice is occupied by a dual bond is thus 1/2.

  • dual price

    The negative dual price tells us that the value of the objective function will reduce by the given amount, if the right-hand side is increased by one unit. It explains the dual price of the optimal solution.

  • Dealing with Dual-Career Couples

    For employing and dealing with dual career couples we will make a peculiar policy that will involve a number of aspects in regard to the management of problems of dual career couples so that they can perform their duties in an effective and efficient

  • Shadow price

    Dual variables in the dual problem are in fact shadow prices of constraints of the primal problem. Shadow prices of the dual constraints are variables in the primal problem and shadow prices of the primal problem are variables in the dual problem.

View More Related Solutions