Become a Member
 

Retrenchment Strategy and its Challenges

Retrenchment strategy is a strategy that is geared towards reducing expenditures; withdraw products or services from the market and to reduce the size of diversity. Retrenching strategy is also known as downsizing and cutback initiatives. The many challenges that are associated with retrenching are as follows:

Growth decline.

Smaller workforce.

Inability to meet consumer demands with smaller workforce.

Lack of diversity.

Decrease in profitability.

Retrenching consequences are "commonly divided into financial, organizational, and human effects (Gandolfi, 2006). Sadly, the picture of reported financial effects following downsizing is a bleak one (Gandolfi & Neck, 2008). A multitude of studies has demonstrated that while some firms have reported financial improvements from downsizing, the vast majority of downsized organizations have failed to reap the anticipated improved levels of efficiency, productivity, profitability, and competitiveness" (Cascio, 1993; Sahdev, 2003; Macky, 2004). The adoption of downsizing is not only expected to generate financial benefits through a direct increase in shareholder value, but to produce organizational benefits, including lower overheads, less bureaucracy, smoother communications, faster decision-making, and increased levels of employee productivity (Burke & Cooper, 2000). While there is some evidence of firms reaping positive outcomes (Macky, 2004), the majority of findings suggests that the adoption of downsizing often falls short of the objectives (Cascio, 1998; Gandolfi & Neck, 2008).

Solution Summary

Retrenching consequences are "commonly divided into financial, organizational, and human effects (Gandolfi, 2006). Sadly, the picture of reported financial effects following downsizing is a bleak one (Gandolfi & Neck, 2008). A multitude of studies has demonstrated that while some firms have reported financial improvements from downsizing, the vast majority of downsized organizations have failed to reap the anticipated improved levels of efficiency, productivity, profitability, and competitiveness" (Cascio, 1993; Sahdev, 2003; Macky, 2004). The adoption of downsizing is not only expected to generate financial benefits through a direct increase in shareholder value, but to produce organizational benefits, including lower overheads, less bureaucracy, smoother communications, faster decision-making, and increased levels of employee productivity (Burke & Cooper, 2000). While there is some evidence of firms reaping positive outcomes (Macky, 2004), the majority of findings suggests that the adoption of downsizing often falls short of the objectives (Cascio, 1998; Gandolfi & Neck, 2008).

$2.19
This answer includes:
  • Plain text
  • Cited sources when necessary
Add to Cart   $2.19

Cheron Turnley, MBA

Rating 4.8/5

Active since 2010

BBM, University of Phoenix
MBA, University of Phoenix

Responses 319 | eBooks 1


Comments on Cheron's work:

"Perfect response just what I needed..."

"great thanks for the example as well"

"This paper is good to go correct because I have to summited top the school's Plagiarism Checker"

"This is awesome!!!! Thank you very much Cheron! :) I'd like to add you to my favorite OTAs because I'm certain that I will need help in the future. Would you mind telling me your price range for responses as well the timeframe for which you prefer me to submit posts to you? I know that one of my other OTAs is quite busy throughout the week and Brainmass is secondary. So, I try to give him as many days as I can. Again, Thank you."

"Great! Thank you"